Loading the registry…
MCP server for reading and analyzing PDF files from local paths or URLs - enables AI assistants to work with PDFs
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
npm: @dev.saqibaziz/mcp-pdf-reader @ 1.1.0, 0 findings
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- @dev.saqibaziz/mcp-pdf-reader
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
8 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
0 findings · 0.5s
v2.0.11
5 findings · 6.6s
v0.3.74
4 findings · 0.9s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 2.9s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 2.9s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 8.2s
v0.71.0
1 finding · 0.2s
v2.3.8
1 finding · 7.3s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2026 | Caution89 | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Caution badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 11 findings across every scanner that examined this package.
These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.
1 AAK-ANTHROPIC-SDK-001
Files: src/index.ts · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-DNS-REBIND-002
Files: package.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-OAUTH-3P-001
Files: package.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-SEC-MD-001
Files: SECURITY.md · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 CVE-2025-66414
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 DATA_EXFIL_JS_FS_ACCESS
Files: /repo/src/index.ts · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 GHSA-w48q-cv73-mx4w
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/.windsurf/mcp.json · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 LOW_ANALYZABILITY
Files: /repo · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
Multiple high-severity vulnerabilities detected.
The artifact contains high-severity vulnerabilities, including a DNS rebinding risk identified in `package.json` and an Anthropic SDK vulnerability in `src/index.ts`. Additionally, a known vulnerability (GHSA-w48q-cv73-mx4w) is present in `package-lock.json`, alongside CVE-2025-66414. These findings indicate potential for network egress, credential access, and other security compromises.
Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.