Loading the registry…
Guide for writing blog articles that people actually read, using research-backed techniques. Trigger phrases: 'write blog post', 'blog article', 'writing tips', 'blog draft', 'article structure', 'headline writing', 'hook writing', 'blog editing', 'content writing', 'engaging post', 'AIDA framework', 'PAS framework', 'blog outline', 'article review', 'improve readability'. Use for: Drafting, structuring, editing, and reviewing blog posts and articles.
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
1 critical finding reported by agent-audit-kit. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- 'performance-dudes/ai-plugins (blog-article-writing)'
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- 'performance-dudes/ai-plugins (blog-article-writing)' ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
4 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
130 findings · 16.3s
v0.3.74
11 findings · 4.8s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 5.8s
v0.1.0
23 findings · 5.8s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.2s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 164 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 1 finding rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 164 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
164 The model's answer could not be read.
Rules: AAK-SKILL-001, AAK-MARKETPLACE-001, AAK-SECRET-004 and 9 more · Files: plugins/workspace-context/skills/workspace-context/SKILL.md, .claude-plugin/marketplace.json, plugins/example/evals/scripts/judge.py and 85 more · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner, nerlo-install-instruction
Artifact contains critical and high-severity findings
The artifact includes critical findings related to skill definitions in `plugins/workspace-context/skills/workspace-context/SKILL.md` and potential sensitive data handling in Python scripts like `klassifiziere.py`, `ocr.py`, and `searchbar.py` within the `plugins/ocr` directory. High-severity findings indicate potential credential access in `plugins/example/evals/scripts/judge.py` and multiple instances of sensitive data exposure or insecure operations in various Python scripts across `plugins/image-toolkit`, `plugins/mechanic`, and `plugins/ocr`. Additionally, there are numerous high-severity findings in `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` related to marketplace definitions.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.
Showing 11 of 11; the rest are in the per-scanner reports above.