Loading the registry…
Automatically manage Docker container hostnames in /etc/hosts for local development and CI
Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
4 critical findings reported by cisco-skill-scanner, 0 of them in the installed artifact. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
pypi: docker-hosts @ 0.1.1, 0 findings
Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI. Review the scanned source before copying them into your own project.
nerlo install -- docker-hosts
8 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
2 findings · 0.8s
v2.0.11
20 findings · 8.2s
v0.3.74
4 findings · 1.7s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.6s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.6s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 7.2s
v0.71.0
0 findings · 0.2s
v2.3.8
0 findings · 1.3s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2026 | Flagged90 | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 26 findings across every scanner that examined this package. 1 of 4 findings rated critical by their scanner was among the dismissals.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 3 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
9 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: YARA_coercive_injection_generic, AAK-AGENT-002, SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION and 2 more · Files: /repo/.github/instructions/SKILL.md, CLAUDE.md, /repo/.github/SKILL.md and 1 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner, agent-audit-kit
3 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/build_and_publish.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit
These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.
3 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/.claude/commands/SKILL.md, /repo/.cursor/commands/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/.claude/commands/SKILL.md, /repo/.cursor/commands/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 YARA_coercive_injection_generic
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH
Files: /repo/playground.py · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/.copier-answers.yml · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: skills-missing-governance-commands/write_readme.md, HIDDEN_DATA_FILE, skills-missing-telemetry-commands/write_readme.md · Files: commands/write_readme.md, /repo/.env-example · reported by agentshield, cisco-skill-scanner
Critical coercive injection findings present
The artifact contains critical findings related to coercive injection in `/repo/SKILL.md`. These findings indicate a potential for control flow manipulation or shell execution. Further investigation is warranted due to the nature of these vulnerabilities.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.