Loading the registry…
Fantasy Premier League MCP Server
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
1 critical finding reported by osv-scanner. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- fpl-mcp-server
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
6 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
17 findings · 6.1s
v0.3.74
7 findings · 0.8s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 2.5s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 2.5s
v0.71.0
27 findings · 0.2s
v2.3.8
28 findings · 1.2s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.6s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Flagged40 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 79 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 1 finding rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 4 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
8 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-AGENT-002, SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE and 1 more · Files: .github/copilot-instructions.md, /repo/.github/SKILL.md, /repo/docs/SKILL.md and 1 more · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner
2 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/ci.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit
The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.
8 FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH
Files: /repo/src/tools/league_tools.py, /repo/src/models/player.py, /repo/src/tools/team_tools.py and 5 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001
Files: pyproject.toml, uv.lock · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
1 CVE-2025-62727
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-66416
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-71176
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-24486
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-26007
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-28684
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-34073
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-39892
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-40347
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-42561
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-4539
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-45409
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-48710
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-48817
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-48818
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-52869
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-53537
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-53538
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-53539
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-53540
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-54282
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-54283
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-59950
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69247
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69248
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69249
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 PYSEC-2026-161
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1617
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1845
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1852
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1942
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2132
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2141
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-215
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2270
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2280
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2281
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-248
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-249
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2987
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3036
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3037
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3038
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3039
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3040
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3041
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3482
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3483
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-35
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3552
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3553
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3554
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-36
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
4 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: AAK-SECRET-006, AAK-SEC-MD-001, SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION and 1 more · Files: .env.example, SECURITY.md, /repo/SKILL.md · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner
Critical and multiple high-severity vulnerabilities detected.
A critical vulnerability (PYSEC-2026-36) is present in a dependency listed in `uv.lock`. This artifact also contains numerous high-severity vulnerabilities, such as CVE-2026-52869 and PYSEC-2026-1942, affecting dependencies specified in `uv.lock` and `pyproject.toml`. These findings indicate potential risks including remote code execution, denial of service, or information disclosure through vulnerable components.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Showing 25 of 30; the rest are in the per-scanner reports above.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.