Loading the registry…
Google Antigravity plugins for Infiquetra development workflows
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
10 critical findings reported by cisco-skill-scanner, agent-audit-kit, 0 of them in the installed artifact. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- infiquetra-antigravity-plugins
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- infiquetra-antigravity-plugins ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
4 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
311 findings · 42.6s
v0.3.74
20 findings · 51.2s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 12.8s
v0.1.0
5 findings · 12.8s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.7s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 336 findings across every scanner that examined this package. 6 of 10 findings rated critical by their scanner were among the dismissals.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 312 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
8 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: COMMAND_INJECTION_EVAL, FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH · Files: /repo/plugins/mission-control/tests/test_issue_contract_parity.py, /repo/plugins/fleet-core/tests/fixtures/antigravity-capabilities/catalog-invalid-command.yaml · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH · Files: /repo/docs/conformance/baselines/reference-lifecycle/manifest.yaml · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/ci.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit
The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.
8 RESOURCE_ABUSE_INFINITE_LOOP
Files: /repo/plugins/mission-control/scripts/sdlc_manager.py, /repo/plugins/saga/scripts/outcome.py, /repo/plugins/saga/scripts/saga.py · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 AAK-SECRET-004
Files: plugins/saga/scripts/status_card.py, plugins/home-lab-ops/skills/team-scaffold/scripts/team_scaffold/profiles_validate.py, plugins/home-lab-ops/skills/team-scaffold/scripts/team_scaffold/vault_wire.py · reported by agent-audit-kit
266 The review call did not complete.
Rules: PIPELINE_TAINT_FLOW, GLOB_HIDDEN_FILE_TARGETING, FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH and 11 more · Files: /repo/plugins/saga/scripts/extract_session_skeleton.py, /repo/plugins/fleet-core/tests/test_antigravity_capabilities.py, /repo/plugins/fleet-core/scripts/fleet_commons/antigravity_diagnostics.py and 159 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner, agent-audit-kit
41 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: SECRET_AWS_KEY, AAK-SECRET-002, opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-pipe-to-shell and 7 more · Files: /repo/plugins/fleet-core/tests/test_antigravity_capabilities.py, plugins/fleet-core/tests/test_antigravity_capabilities.py, /repo/plugins/home-lab-ops/skills/monitoring-guard/SKILL.md and 12 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner, agent-audit-kit, nerlo-install-instruction
5 The model did not answer for these findings.
Rules: AAK-SECRET-003, DATA_EXFIL_NETWORK_REQUESTS · Files: plugins/fleet-core/tests/test_antigravity_capabilities.py, /repo/plugins/unifi/src/unifi_network_client.py, /repo/plugins/unifi/src/unifi_protect_client.py · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner
Critical credential exposure and shell execution risks.
The artifact contains critical findings indicating potential exposure of AWS keys and other secrets within test files and various scripts. High severity findings reveal potential for shell execution, resource exhaustion, and command injection through tainted data flows. Additionally, medium severity findings highlight undeclared network egress and targeting of hidden files, which could lead to data exfiltration.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.
Showing 7 of 7; the rest are in the per-scanner reports above.