AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real

350

Dismissed as false positives

Not reviewed

Out of 355 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 4 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

3 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/.github/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-AGENT-005 · Files: AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md · reported by agent-audit-kit

In installed code — never dismissed

These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.

7 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/.copilot/skills/cleanup.md, /repo/.copilot/skills/env-isolation.md, /repo/.copilot/skills/task-tracking.md and 4 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4 CVE-2026-48779
Files: backend/package-lock.json, package-lock.json · reported by trivy
4 GHSA-5c6j-r48x-rmvq
Files: package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
4 GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj
Files: package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
4 GHSA-96hv-2xvq-fx4p
Files: /repo/backend/package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
3 CVE-2026-45736
Files: backend/package-lock.json, package-lock.json

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities detected in dependencies

Multiple critical vulnerabilities are present in the artifact's dependencies, as indicated by findings like CVE-2026-9277 and GHSA-xv26-6w52-cph6. These issues could potentially lead to remote code execution, denial of service, or information disclosure. Numerous high severity vulnerabilities are also identified across various dependencies. Attention is warranted for all critical and high severity findings listed in the package-lock.json files.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-w7jw-789q-3m8p · /repo/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-xv26-6w52-cph6 · /repo/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2026-54466 · package-lock.json · critical · reported by trivy
CVE-2026-9277 · package-lock.json · critical · reported by trivy
LOW_ANALYZABILITY · /repo · high · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
GHSA-2m8v-j782-fhvr · /repo/backend/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-38f7-945m-qr2g · /repo/backend/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp · /repo/backend/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
· · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real

350

Dismissed as false positives

Not reviewed

Out of 355 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 4 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

3 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/.github/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-AGENT-005 · Files: AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md · reported by agent-audit-kit

In installed code — never dismissed

7 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/.copilot/skills/cleanup.md, /repo/.copilot/skills/env-isolation.md, /repo/.copilot/skills/task-tracking.md and 4 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4 CVE-2026-48779
Files: backend/package-lock.json, package-lock.json · reported by trivy
4 GHSA-5c6j-r48x-rmvq
Files: package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
4 GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj
Files: package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
4 GHSA-96hv-2xvq-fx4p
Files: /repo/backend/package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
3 CVE-2026-45736
Files: backend/package-lock.json, package-lock.json

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities detected in dependencies

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-w7jw-789q-3m8p · /repo/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-xv26-6w52-cph6 · /repo/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2026-54466 · package-lock.json · critical · reported by trivy
CVE-2026-9277 · package-lock.json · critical · reported by trivy
LOW_ANALYZABILITY · /repo · high · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
GHSA-2m8v-j782-fhvr · /repo/backend/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-38f7-945m-qr2g · /repo/backend/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp · /repo/backend/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
· · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

vaultwares-dispatch

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged45

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

What the review concluded

What to look at