A MCP server to install other MCP servers
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
npm: @anaisbetts/mcp-installer @ 0.5.0, 0 findings
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- @anaisbetts/mcp-installer
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
8 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
0 findings · 0.6s
v2.0.11
3 findings · 6.3s
v0.3.74
3 findings · 0.7s
v0.2.0
0 findings · 3.2s
v0.2.0
0 findings · 3.2s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 8.8s
v0.71.0
10 findings · 0.2s
v2.3.8
19 findings · 7.0s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
6 scans on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2026 | Flagged48 | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
| Jul 21, 2026 | Flagged52 | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner: complete | completed |
| Jul 20, 2026 | Flagged50 | Clean → Flagged | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner: complete | completed |
| Jul 20, 2026 | Clean100 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner ·n/a: not applicableagent-audit-kit: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
| Jul 20, 2026 | Clean100 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner ·n/a: not applicableagent-audit-kit: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
| Jul 20, 2026 | Clean100 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner ·n/a: not applicableagent-audit-kit: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 35 findings across every scanner that examined this package.
These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.
2 GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-3ppc-4f35-3m26
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-7r86-cg39-jmmj
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-f886-m6hf-6m8v
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-mh99-v99m-4gvg
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-rgw5-rvv9-x895
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-v6h2-p8h4-qcjw
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 AAK-DNS-REBIND-002
Files: package.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-OAUTH-3P-001
Files: package.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-SEC-MD-001
Files: SECURITY.md · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 CVE-2025-5889
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-64756
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-66414
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-13149
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-14257
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-26996
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-27903
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-27904
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-33750
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69152
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 GHSA-5j98-mcp5-4vw2
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-73rr-hh4g-fpgx
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-w48q-cv73-mx4w
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 LOW_ANALYZABILITY
Files: /repo · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
High severity vulnerabilities in dependencies and potential DNS rebinding risk.
The artifact contains multiple high severity vulnerabilities in its dependencies, as identified by OSV-scanner and Trivy in `package-lock.json`. Additionally, a high severity DNS rebinding vulnerability (AAK-DNS-REBIND-002) is present in `package.json`, which could facilitate unauthorized network egress or access to internal services. These findings indicate potential for remote code execution or data exposure through compromised components.
Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.