Loading the registry…
Run a thorough, whole-project WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility audit — fingerprint the UI surfaces, map semantics/landmarks, keyboard paths, focus management, contrast (against the design-system tokens), forms/errors, and media alternatives, credit what's already handled with evidence, run automated checks (axe) plus the manual checks automation can't do, deliver an inline audit report, and (after one confirmation) file each finding as a scoped, pipeline-ready GitHub issue. Use this skill WHENEVER the user asks for an accessibility assessment of a project as a whole: "accessibility audit", "a11y audit", "is this WCAG compliant", "can screen reader users use this", "check our contrast/keyboard support", "are we ADA compliant", "audit this for accessibility". This is the whole-codebase, point-in-time audit — distinct from `frontend`/`mobile`/`design-system` (which build accessibility in as they ship) and `code-review` (which checks one diff as it ships). Strictly read-only: it never fixes markup or styles and never runs exploits — remediation flows through the filed issues into the normal plan → PR → review pipeline.
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
41 critical findings reported by cisco-skill-scanner, agent-audit-kit, 8 of them in the installed artifact. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- accessibility-audit
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- accessibility-audit ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
5 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
9 findings · 0.6s
v2.0.11
351 findings · 49.5s
v0.3.26
40 findings · 22.6s
v0.1.0
7 findings · 15.6s
v0.1.0
2 findings · 15.6s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image, nerlo-multi-source.
4 scans on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
| Aug 3, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner ·!: timeoutagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
| Jul 30, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | cisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
This review has not run for this scan yet. It runs once per scan, in the background, and is kept; it appears here when it has. Until then all 409 findings above stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity.