Loading the registry…
Edit existing images using Codex CLI's imagegen skill. Trigger when the user asks to: edit image, modify image, change image, update image, alter image, transform image, replace background, remove background, recolor, resize image, crop image, add text to image.
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- 'fenish/claude-code-booster (edit)'
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- 'fenish/claude-code-booster (edit)' ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
4 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
23 findings · 9.0s
v0.3.74
6 findings · 2.5s
v0.1.0
2 findings · 3.6s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.6s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.9s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 31 findings across every scanner that examined this package.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 23 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.
6 AAK-MARKETPLACE-001
Files: .claude-plugin/marketplace.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-py-dynamic-exec
Files: /repo/plugins/linter/linter/linters/base.py · reported by nerlo-behavioral
23 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, HIDDEN_DATA_FILE, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/reverse-engineer/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/skill-finder/SKILL.md and 14 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
Critical findings for dynamic execution and sensitive data handling.
The artifact exhibits critical findings related to sensitive data handling and insecure operations in `image_gen.py`, `linter/base.py`, `reverse-engineer/base.py`, and `triage.py`. It also includes high severity findings for dynamic code execution. Further high severity findings from `agent-audit-kit` in `marketplace.json` and `bearer` in `image_gen.py` and `frontend-roadmap` scripts require review.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Showing 6 of 6; the rest are in the per-scanner reports above.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.