Loading the registry…
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
2 critical findings reported by cisco-skill-scanner, 0 of them in the installed artifact. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
This artifact ships from 2 sources and their verdicts differ. The worst is github (Flagged). Installing from a cleaner source does not mean the others are safe — check the source you actually install from.
github: https://github.com/pallgeuer/la-dev-codex-plugins, 63 findings
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- la-dev-codex-plugins
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- la-dev-codex-plugins ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
5 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
29 findings · 11.1s
v0.3.74
3 findings · 11.7s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 4.9s
v0.1.0
6 findings · 4.9s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 7.7s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source: complete | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 38 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 2 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 38 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
37 The model's answer could not be read.
Rules: COMMAND_INJECTION_OS_SYSTEM, RESOURCE_ABUSE_INFINITE_LOOP, PIPELINE_TAINT_FLOW and 9 more · Files: /repo/tests/contracts/test_bounded_process.py, /repo/tests/codex_perform/test_runtime.py, /repo/plugins/toolkit/skills/perform/scripts/toolkit_perform_runtime/action_catalogue.py and 19 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner, nerlo-install-instruction, agent-audit-kit
1 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-shell-inline-command · Files: /repo/TESTING.md · reported by nerlo-install-instruction
Artifact contains critical command injection and sensitive data handling risks.
The artifact includes critical findings related to potential command injection, which could lead to shell execution, in test files like `/repo/tests/codex_perform/test_runtime.py`. Multiple critical findings from the 'bearer' scanner indicate risks associated with sensitive data handling or credential access across various Python scripts, including `/repo/plugins/la-review/skills/loupe/scripts/collect_review_diff.py` and `/repo/src/la_dev_codex_plugins/_process.py`. Additionally, high severity findings point to potential issues with marketplace plugin configurations in `.agents/plugins/marketplace.json` and further sensitive data handling concerns.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Showing 4 of 4; the rest are in the per-scanner reports above.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.