Loading the registry…
The no-key IP intelligence MCP server — remote MCP wrapper around the free HackMyIP public API.
The publisher performed an authenticated act of publication — proving control of a namespace in the official MCP registry, or appearing in a first-party catalogue an operator curates. That establishes WHO published it. It is not a security finding, and attested artifacts carry Flagged verdicts too.
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- hackmyip-mcp
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
7 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
0 findings · 0.5s
v2.0.11
5 findings · 6.6s
v0.3.26
3 findings · 0.8s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 26.9s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 26.9s
v0.71.0
0 findings · 0.2s
v2.3.8
5 findings · 6.6s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
No report in this scan: nerlo-multi-source.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2026 | Caution89 | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Caution badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 13 findings across every scanner that examined this package.
These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.
2 DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK
Files: /repo/src/api.ts, /repo/src/server.ts · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 AAK-SEC-MD-001
Files: SECURITY.md · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-SSRF-002
Files: src/server.ts · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-SUPPLY-005
Files: package-lock.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 GHSA-4cwx-7wf7-3272
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-8xcm-r25x-g524
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-jr45-8vmc-qm54
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-m8rv-5g2x-5cg5
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-v3r7-h72x-cjcm
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 LOW_ANALYZABILITY
Files: /repo · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
Artifact has high-severity vulnerabilities, including potential network egress.
The artifact contains a high-severity Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in `src/server.ts`, which could enable network egress and access to internal resources. It also includes a high-severity dependency vulnerability identified as `GHSA-4cwx-7wf7-3272` in `package-lock.json`. Multiple medium-severity vulnerabilities are also present in dependencies. These findings warrant careful attention before deployment.
Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.