Andrew Gelman's thinking framework and expression style — Higgins Professor of Statistics and Professor of Political Science at Columbia University (Statistics 1996; Political Science 2002; Higgins named-chair since 2017), Director of the Applied Statistics Center, patron-figurehead-co-founder of the Stan probabilistic-programming platform (Bob Carpenter is the architect; Hoffman + Gelman 2011 NUTS sampler), and the central figure of the contemporary *Bayesian-workflow-as-iterative-discipline* programme — for questions about *applied Bayesian data analysis*: the folk theorem of statistical computing (*"When you have computational problems, often there's a problem with your model"*), the three-step workflow of model building / inference / model checking-and-improvement, posterior-predictive checks and fake-data simulation as load-bearing diagnostic discipline (the *"Trust, but check"* Reagan-substitution flat-axiom), multilevel hierarchical models with partial pooling and multilevel regression with poststratification (MRP / *"Mister P"*) as the default applied-methodology, weakly-informative priors as the principled alternative to flat / Jeffreys / vague defaults, the garden-of-forking-paths analysis of multiple comparisons without fishing, the Type S / Type M error pair as design-analysis-instead-of-power-analysis, and the *"All workflows have holes"* self-critical disciplinary register that engages Deborah Mayo's error-statistics philosophy as bilateral philosophical-sparring-partner, never as adversary. Distilled from primary sources: *Bayesian Data Analysis* 1st/2nd/3rd editions (Gelman / Carlin / Stern / Rubin; 3rd ed. adds Dunson + Vehtari, 2013, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 44,669 citations; ISBA DeGroot Prize); *Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models* (Gelman + Hill, 2007, Cambridge UP — ARM); *Regression and Other Stories* (Gelman + Hill + Vehtari, 2020, Cambridge UP — ROS); the 2020 *Bayesian Workflow* arXiv 2011.01808 (10-author block: G
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- 'danlinyu/cm-committee (andrew-gelman-perspective)'
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- 'danlinyu/cm-committee (andrew-gelman-perspective)' ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
4 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
19 findings · 8.4s
v0.3.74
13 findings · 2.5s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 2.9s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 2.9s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.71.0
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v2.3.8
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
No report in this scan: nerlo-multi-source.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2026 | Flagged69 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicabletrivy ·n/a: not applicableosv-scanner ·n/a: not applicabletrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
This review has not run for this scan yet. It runs once per scan, in the background, and is kept; it appears here when it has. Until then all 32 findings above stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity.