urlDNA MCP Server - The DNA test for websites
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
3 critical findings reported by trivy, osv-scanner. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- urldna-mcp-server
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
6 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
5 findings · 6.1s
v0.3.74
7 findings · 1.2s
v0.2.0
1 finding · 3.1s
v0.1.0
2 findings · 3.1s
v0.71.0
35 findings · 0.2s
v2.3.8
36 findings · 1.4s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 2.0s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
7 scans on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2026 | Flagged37 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
| Jul 30, 2026 | Flagged43 | — | cisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
| Jul 21, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner: complete | rejected |
| Jul 20, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner: complete | rejected |
| Jul 20, 2026 | Scan Halted | Clean → Flagged | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner: complete | rejected |
| Jul 20, 2026 | Clean100 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner ·n/a: not applicableagent-audit-kit: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
| Jul 20, 2026 | Clean100 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner ·n/a: not applicableagent-audit-kit: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 86 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 3 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.
These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.
2 AAK-MCP-SSRF-001
Files: urldna_mcp/tools/fast_check.py, urldna_mcp/tools/new_scan.py · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 GHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j
Files: /repo/uv.lock, uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
2 GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 PIPELINE_TAINT_FLOW
Files: /repo/README.md, /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 AAK-MCP-018
Files: gemini_example.py · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-MCP-HTTP-NOAUTH-SERVER-001
Files: urldna_mcp/server.py · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001
Files: uv.lock · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-SEC-MD-001
Files: SECURITY.md · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-SECRET-007
Files: claude_desktop_config.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 CVE-2025-64340
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-27124
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-32597
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-32871
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-34073
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-39892
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-40347
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-41425
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-41479
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-42561
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-44681
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-4539
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-45409
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-48522
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-48523
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-48524
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-48525
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-48526
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-48710
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-48817
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-48818
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-52869
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-52870
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-53537
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-53538
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-53539
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-53540
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-54283
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-59950
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69247
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69249
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-bind-all-interfaces
Files: /repo/urldna_mcp/server.py · reported by nerlo-behavioral
1 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-pipe-to-shell
Files: /repo/README.md · reported by nerlo-install-instruction
1 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-shell-inline-command
Files: /repo/README.md · reported by nerlo-install-instruction
1 PYSEC-2026-120
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-161
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-175
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-176
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-177
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-178
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-179
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-188
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2119
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2132
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-215
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2280
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2281
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2475
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2476
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-248
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-249
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-25
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2987
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3036
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3037
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3038
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3039
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3040
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3041
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-338
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3481
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3482
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3483
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-35
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3552
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3553
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3554
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-36
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 TOOL_ABUSE_UNDECLARED_NETWORK
Files: /repo/repo/README.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.
1 CVE-2026-54282
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69248
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
Critical vulnerabilities, unauthenticated server, and risky installation method.
The artifact contains critical and high-severity vulnerabilities in its dependencies, identified in `uv.lock`. An unauthenticated HTTP server component is present in `urldna_mcp/server.py`, which could allow unauthorized access. Furthermore, the installation instructions in `README.md` suggest piping to shell, which carries a risk of arbitrary shell execution during setup. Medium-severity findings also indicate potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and undeclared network activity.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.
Showing 25 of 33; the rest are in the per-scanner reports above.