AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real

232

Dismissed as false positives

Not reviewed

Out of 247 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 6 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

13 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE, MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME · Files: /repo/.github/SKILL.md, /repo/docs/SKILL.md, /repo/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/SKILL.md and 3 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK · Files: /repo/backend/request_test.js · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

In installed code — never dismissed

These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.

17 DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK
Files: /repo/mobile/src/screens/InboundReceiveScreen.tsx, /repo/mobile/src/services/AuthService.ts, /repo/mobile/src/services/HttpService.ts and 2 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
6 GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj
Files: /repo/backend/package-lock.json, /repo/mobile/package-lock.json, mobile/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
4 GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp
Files: /repo/backend/package-lock.json, /repo/mobile/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-52cp-r559-cp3m
Files: /repo/backend/package-lock.json, /repo/mobile/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-h67p-54hq-rp68
Files: /repo/backend/package-lock.json, /repo/mobile/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-mh99-v99m-4gvg

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and credential exposure risk identified.

The artifact contains multiple critical vulnerabilities in its mobile dependencies and numerous high-severity vulnerabilities in its backend dependencies. Code in `mobile/src/services/AuthService.ts` performs network egress after accessing secrets, which warrants close attention. The overall low analyzability of the repository may obscure further risks.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/mobile/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-w7jw-789q-3m8p · /repo/mobile/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-xv26-6w52-cph6 · /repo/mobile/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2026-54466 · mobile/package-lock.json · critical · reported by trivy
CVE-2026-59873 · mobile/package-lock.json · critical · reported by trivy
CVE-2026-9277 · mobile/package-lock.json · critical · reported by trivy
LOW_ANALYZABILITY · /repo · high · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-js-secret-to-network-egress · /repo/mobile/src/services/AuthService.ts · high · reported by nerlo-behavioral

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real

232

Dismissed as false positives

Not reviewed

Out of 247 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 6 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

13 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE, MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME · Files: /repo/.github/SKILL.md, /repo/docs/SKILL.md, /repo/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/SKILL.md and 3 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK · Files: /repo/backend/request_test.js · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

In installed code — never dismissed

17 DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK
Files: /repo/mobile/src/screens/InboundReceiveScreen.tsx, /repo/mobile/src/services/AuthService.ts, /repo/mobile/src/services/HttpService.ts and 2 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
6 GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj
Files: /repo/backend/package-lock.json, /repo/mobile/package-lock.json, mobile/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
4 GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp
Files: /repo/backend/package-lock.json, /repo/mobile/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-52cp-r559-cp3m
Files: /repo/backend/package-lock.json, /repo/mobile/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-h67p-54hq-rp68
Files: /repo/backend/package-lock.json, /repo/mobile/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-mh99-v99m-4gvg

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and credential exposure risk identified.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/mobile/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-w7jw-789q-3m8p · /repo/mobile/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-xv26-6w52-cph6 · /repo/mobile/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2026-54466 · mobile/package-lock.json · critical · reported by trivy
CVE-2026-59873 · mobile/package-lock.json · critical · reported by trivy
CVE-2026-9277 · mobile/package-lock.json · critical · reported by trivy
LOW_ANALYZABILITY · /repo · high · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-js-secret-to-network-egress · /repo/mobile/src/services/AuthService.ts · high · reported by nerlo-behavioral

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

mertarslanbulut/micro-wms

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (6)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (5)

agentshield

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (6)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (5)

agentshield

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged31

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

What the review concluded

What to look at