Loading the registry…
Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
2 critical findings reported by cisco-skill-scanner. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI. Review the scanned source before copying them into your own project.
nerlo install -- jtchilders/inference_service_test
4 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
6 findings · 7.6s
v0.3.74
9 findings · 4.5s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.8s
v0.1.0
1 finding · 3.8s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.9s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 16 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 2 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 2 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
3 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-run-bundled-artifact, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/docs/SKILL.md, /repo/docs/globus_compute_guide.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner, nerlo-install-instruction
1 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-SPLUNK-TOKLOG-001 · Files: test_sophia_integration.py · reported by agent-audit-kit
The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.
3 AAK-LANGCHAIN-001
Files: requirements.txt · reported by agent-audit-kit
3 AAK-LANGCHAIN-003
Files: requirements.txt · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 COMMAND_INJECTION_EVAL
Files: /repo/src/training/trainer.py · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 AAK-SECRET-004
Files: src/utils/inference_auth_token.py · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-SSRF-TOCTOU-001
Files: requirements.txt · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
Critical command injection and credential exposure risks.
The artifact contains critical command injection vulnerabilities in `src/training/trainer.py`, enabling shell execution. Multiple critical findings are also present in agent-related files such as `deployment_agent.py` and `job_scheduler.py`. A high-severity finding indicates credential exposure in `src/utils/inference_auth_token.py`, and a medium-severity SSRF finding suggests network egress capabilities. High-severity LangChain findings also point to potential for arbitrary code execution.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.
Showing 9 of 9; the rest are in the per-scanner reports above.