Loading the registry…
MCP server that proxies multiple LSP servers
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- mcp-lsp-proxy
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
7 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
2 findings · 8.8s
v0.3.74
5 findings · 1.8s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.3s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.3s
vv0.3.2
Incomplete run
0 findings · 0.5s
v0.71.0
0 findings · 0.2s
v2.3.8
58 findings · 0.7s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 2.3s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Flagged95 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·!: incompletenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 65 findings across every scanner that examined this package.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 3 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
58 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: GO-2026-6090, GO-2025-3420, GO-2025-4006 and 55 more · Files: /repo/tests/test_go_workspace/go.mod · reported by osv-scanner
The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.
1 AAK-DNS-REBIND-002
Files: pyproject.toml · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001
Files: pyproject.toml · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-OAUTH-3P-001
Files: pyproject.toml · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-SUPPLY-004
Files: pyproject.toml · reported by agent-audit-kit
3 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: AAK-SEC-MD-001, SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: SECURITY.md, /repo/SKILL.md · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner
High severity findings require attention
The artifact contains high severity findings related to a DNS rebind vulnerability and a specific CVE in an SDK, both noted in `pyproject.toml`. An additional high severity finding from the Bearer scanner is present in `/repo/mcp_lsp_proxy/config.py`. These findings indicate potential for network egress control, security boundary bypass, or other critical system impacts. Further investigation into these specific vulnerabilities is warranted.
Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.