Loading the registry…
量化回测代码的"照妖镜"——逐项审查会让回测虚高、实盘亏钱的工程陷阱(未来函数/前视偏差、过拟合/数据窥探、成交真实性/成本、收益口径错误),按严重度(致命/高危/中/低)输出一张"回测体检报告"。 何时触发:用户把量化策略/回测代码、信号生成、数据加载、参数寻优脚本丢过来让你审查可信度;或问"这个回测能信吗/为什么实盘对不上回测/帮我查未来函数/有没有过拟合"。 触发词(中):回测审查、回测照妖镜、回测体检、未来函数、前视偏差、数据泄漏、过拟合、数据窥探、幸存者偏差、回测陷阱、回测可信度、实盘对不上回测。 触发词(英):backtest audit、backtest review、look-ahead bias、lookahead、data leakage、overfitting、survivorship bias、curve fitting、backtest-guard。 不适用场景:实时实盘下单/风控逻辑本身的 bug、单纯策略调参或求 alpha、行情数据源运维、非量化的通用代码审查、要你"预测收益/荐股/给买卖建议"——这些都不在本 skill 范围。
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- 'paidaxing1234/latency-hunter-toolkit (backtest-guard)'
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- 'paidaxing1234/latency-hunter-toolkit (backtest-guard)' ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
3 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
15 findings · 10.3s
v0.3.74
1 finding · 1.3s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 4.2s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.3s
v0.1.0
No source files this scanner can analyze were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 4.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.2s
v0.71.0
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.3s
v2.3.8
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2026 | Caution89 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy ·n/a: not applicableosv-scanner ·n/a: not applicabletrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Caution badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
This review has not run for this scan yet. It runs once per scan, in the background, and is kept; it appears here when it has. Until then all 16 findings above stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity.