Loading the registry…
Triage and act on a code review. Takes reviewer feedback — from a human, a PR, or an external agent that lacked your plan and chat history — and works through it without assuming the reviewer is right. Verifies each item against the actual current code, applies the straightforward, valid, relevant, small, and uncontested fixes directly, and escalates the load-bearing or risky ones — anything that affects performance, backward compatibility, public API/behavior, or needs a larger refactor — to you as easy-to-read options, then runs the project's quality gates before reporting. Use when you say "address this review", "apply the review feedback", "go through the review comments", "handle the PR feedback", "act on this code review", "fix what the reviewer found", or after /code-review or an external agent produces findings. Do NOT use to *produce* a review (use code-review or high-stakes for that), nor to apply every suggested change blindly without verifying.
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
97 critical findings reported by agent-audit-kit, 0 of them in the installed artifact. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- address-feedback
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- address-feedback ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
5 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
2 findings · 0.6s
v2.0.11
57 findings · 9.6s
v0.3.26
119 findings · 2.2s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.7s
v0.1.0
14 findings · 3.7s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image, nerlo-multi-source.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
This review has not run for this scan yet. It runs once per scan, in the background, and is kept; it appears here when it has. Until then all 192 findings above stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity.