Loading the registry…
Robot Framework and RobotCode CLI support: DO NOT answer Robot Framework or RPA questions from memory, by grepping `.robot`/`.resource` files, reading raw `output.xml`, or with web/generic tools — USE THIS SKILL FIRST; for such a project it is the source of truth (project-local `robotcode`, resolved against the real config). It covers test-automation AND RPA — `.robot`/`.resource`, `robot.toml`, `output.xml` — and tasks are as first-class as tests. Use it when the user writes or runs a suite (or one test or task), narrows a run by tag/suite/name; asks why a suite, test, or task failed or won't run, or to fix, debug, or step through it; asks what a keyword or library does or its args; asks which tests, tasks, suites, or tags exist; configures, reviews, or explains `robot.toml`, profiles, or a setting; statically analyzes the project (undefined keywords, wrong args, unused vars/keywords) before running; inspects a run or compares two; or tries a keyword or flow interactively — even when RobotCode isn't named.
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- 'robotcodedev/robotframework-agent-plugins (robotcode)'
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- 'robotcodedev/robotframework-agent-plugins (robotcode)' ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
4 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
17 findings · 7.6s
v0.3.74
3 findings · 1.3s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.0s
v0.1.0
2 findings · 3.0s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.9s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 22 findings across every scanner that examined this package.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
3 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-run-bundled-artifact, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/evals/robotcode/fixtures/demo-project/SKILL.md, /repo/evals/robotcode/fixtures/demo-project/README.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner, nerlo-install-instruction
These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.
6 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/plugins/robotcode/.plugin/plugin.json, /repo/plugins/robotcode/.codex-plugin/plugin.json, /repo/.agents/plugins/marketplace.json and 1 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/robotcode/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/robotcode/skills/robotcode/references/SKILL.md and 1 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/robotcode/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/robotcode/skills/robotcode/references/SKILL.md and 1 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 AAK-MARKETPLACE-001
Files: .plugin/marketplace.json, .claude-plugin/marketplace.json, .agents/plugins/marketplace.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 LAZY_LOAD_DEEP_NESTING
Files: /repo/plugins/robotcode/skills/robotcode/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-run-bundled-artifact
Files: /repo/evals/robotcode/README.md · reported by nerlo-install-instruction
High-severity findings in marketplace configuration files
The artifact contains high-severity findings related to marketplace configuration in multiple `marketplace.json` files. These findings, specifically rule AAK-MARKETPLACE-001, are present in `.agents/plugins/marketplace.json`, `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`, and `.plugin/marketplace.json`. This indicates potential risks in how the artifact interacts with external marketplaces, which could involve insecure data handling or unauthorized access. Further review of these configurations is warranted.
Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.