Loading the registry…
MCP server for generating Cypress test cases and Page Object Models
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
2 critical findings reported by trivy, osv-scanner. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- cypress-test-gen-mcp
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
7 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
0 findings · 0.8s
v2.0.11
8 findings · 7.5s
v0.3.74
6 findings · 1.7s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.7s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.7s
v0.71.0
41 findings · 0.2s
v2.3.8
60 findings · 7.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 2.2s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Flagged45 | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 115 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 2 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 84 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.
3 DATA_EXFIL_JS_FS_ACCESS
Files: /repo/src/index.ts · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 AAK-OAUTH-3P-001
Files: package.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-SUPPLY-003
Files: package.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 CVE-2025-13466
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-15284
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-64718
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-14643
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-1525
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-16729
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-42338
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-45736
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-8723
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-9678
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-9679
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 GHSA-2g4f-4pwh-qvx6
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-2mjp-6q6p-2qxm
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-35p6-xmwp-9g52
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-48c2-rrv3-qjmp
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-4992-7rv2-5pvq
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-m8rv-5g2x-5cg5
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-mh29-5h37-fv8m
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-p88m-4jfj-68fv
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-v2v4-37r5-5v8g
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-v3r7-h72x-cjcm
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-w7fw-mjwx-w883
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-wqch-xfxh-vrr4
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 LOW_ANALYZABILITY
Files: /repo · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
82 The model's answer could not be read.
Rules: CVE-2026-27699, GHSA-5rq4-664w-9x2c, GHSA-7r86-cg39-jmmj and 69 more · Files: package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json, package.json and 4 more · reported by trivy, osv-scanner, agent-audit-kit and 1 more
1 The model did not answer for these findings.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION · Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
Critical and high-severity vulnerabilities detected in installed code.
The artifact contains critical vulnerabilities, including one related to CVE-2026-27699 and GHSA-5rq4-664w-9x2c. Additionally, numerous high-severity vulnerabilities are present, such as potential DNS rebinding risks and issues within the Anthropic SDK, which may involve network egress and credential handling. These findings are located across various dependency files and source code.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.
Showing 25 of 55; the rest are in the per-scanner reports above.