Loading the registry…
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- vite_react_shadcn_ts
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
7 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
0 findings · 0.5s
v2.0.11
5 findings · 8.2s
v0.3.74
2 findings · 2.2s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.3s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.3s
v0.71.0
26 findings · 0.4s
v2.3.8
47 findings · 8.8s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 2.0s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2026 | Flagged49 | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 80 findings across every scanner that examined this package.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 3 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.
2 CVE-2026-40181
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
2 GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-2j2x-hqr9-3h42
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-3ppc-4f35-3m26
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-7r86-cg39-jmmj
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-f886-m6hf-6m8v
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-mh99-v99m-4gvg
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-rgw5-rvv9-x895
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 AAK-LEGAL-002
Files: package.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-SUPPLY-005
Files: package-lock.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 BINARY_FILE_DETECTED
Files: /repo/bun.lockb · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 CVE-2025-13465
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-64756
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-68470
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-13149
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-14257
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-22029
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-26996
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-27903
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-27904
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-2950
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-33532
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-33671
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-33672
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-33750
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-41305
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-45623
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-4800
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-53666
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-53669
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-67213
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-67214
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69152
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69153
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-73646
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
1 GHSA-25h7-pfq9-p65f
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-28wg-ghj8-5hjv
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-2g4f-4pwh-qvx6
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-2w69-qvjg-hvjx
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-337j-9hxr-rhxg
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-48c2-rrv3-qjmp
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-4w7w-66w2-5vf9
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-52cp-r559-cp3m
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-5j98-mcp5-4vw2
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-67mh-4wv8-2f99
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-6g55-p6wh-862q
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-93m4-6634-74q7
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-9jcx-v3wj-wh4m
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-f23m-r3pf-42rh
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-fx2h-pf6j-xcff
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-fxqj-rqcc-2cmp
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-g4jq-h2w9-997c
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-h67p-54hq-rp68
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-jqfw-vq24-v9c3
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-mh29-5h37-fv8m
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-mw96-cpmx-2vgc
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-qx2v-qp2m-jg93
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-r28c-9q8g-f849
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-r5fr-rjxr-66jc
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-rf6f-7fwh-wjgh
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-v6wh-96g9-6wx3
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-wrjc-x8rr-h8h6
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 UNANALYZABLE_BINARY
Files: /repo/bun.lockb · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 The model did not answer for these findings.
Rules: LOW_ANALYZABILITY · Files: /repo · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
Multiple high-severity vulnerabilities found in dependencies.
The artifact includes dependencies with numerous high-severity vulnerabilities, identified by multiple GHSA and CVE findings. These vulnerabilities could expose the system to risks such as remote code execution, denial of service, or information disclosure. Users should carefully review the detailed findings to assess potential impacts and necessary mitigations.
Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Showing 25 of 25; the rest are in the per-scanner reports above.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.