Loading the registry…
Build the weekly business review document that carries a recurring review meeting. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write a 4-block business review, turn raw weekly status inputs into a review document, set or rewrite goals for a review period, fix goals written as retrospective metrics, check whether a review draft is ready to send, or fix a recurring review that stopped producing decisions. Trigger on phrases like 4-block review, 4 blocker, weekly business review, business review doc, WBR, build our review deck, put the review in a spreadsheet, what should our goals be this quarter, is this review ready to send. Even if the user only asks for the summary paragraph, use this skill so the summary is built from the blocks underneath it instead of written first and defended after. Produces three artifacts, a 4-Block Business Review built from raw inputs, a Goal Set written as controllable inputs with every rewrite shown, and a Draft Check with a verdict.
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
2 critical findings reported by cisco-skill-scanner. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- andrewluxem/4-blocker-business-reviews
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- andrewluxem/4-blocker-business-reviews ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
3 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
10 findings · 10.6s
v0.3.74
1 finding · 1.0s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 4.1s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.3s
v0.1.0
No source files this scanner can analyze were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 4.1s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image, nerlo-multi-source.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
This review has not run for this scan yet. It runs once per scan, in the background, and is kept; it appears here when it has. Until then all 11 findings above stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity.