olcayseygan/crumora (audit)

Analyses code from several independent perspectives, then makes those perspectives argue with each other until they converge on a shared verdict. Each lens reviews blind, every finding is cross-examined by a lens that wants to kill it, conflicts are resolved as explicit trade-offs rather than averaged away, and the result is a ranked findings table with recorded dissent plus a full analysis. Use when the user says "/audit", "audit this code", "red-team this", "review this code from every angle", "review this code", "critique this", "analyse this code", "what's wrong with this", "look at this from every angle", "is this any good". For rewriting use rewrite, for improving in place use refactor, for UI use reskin. This skill judges code — for measuring data and writing the result up as a report, use report instead.

Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.

Source:

github.com/olcayseygan/crumora

Provenance:

Found by crawling (provenance, not a security rating)

We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.