Loading the registry…
LINE クリエイターズスタンプ生成工程（コンセプトヒアリング → stamp_spec.json → 環境準備 → 画像生成 → 切り出し → クロマキー透過 → LINE 規格リサイズ → 申請用テキスト生成）を 01〜07 の Skill を連結して一気通貫で実行するオーケストレータ。指定枚数（既定 8 枚）を 1 枚のグリッド画像として効率生成し、最終的に LINE クリエイターズマーケットに申請可能な 370×320 透過 PNG / メイン 240×240 / トークタブ 96×74（center-crop）と、タイトル＋説明文（160 字以内）の metadata.md/json まで出力する。API コスト発生ポイントの承認制御、再生成ループ、部分実行・中断再開を司る。各 SKILL は **中間生成ファイル**（`output/01_concept.md` / `stamp_spec.json` / `output/07_drafts.md` 等）でハンドオフし、よく使うパラメータは **`references/presets.json` のオプションマクロ** で名前指定する運用。TRIGGER: LINE スタンプ生成、LINE スタンプ作成、creators stamp generation、line stamp pipeline、line stamp orchestration、スタンプ一括作成、キャラスタンプ量産、文字入りスタンプ生成。
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- 'hashito/hashito-public-skills (00_line_stamp_runner)'
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- 'hashito/hashito-public-skills (00_line_stamp_runner)' ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
4 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
29 findings · 9.9s
v0.3.74
1 finding · 1.4s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.2s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.2s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.0s
v0.71.0
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v2.3.8
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Caution92 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy ·n/a: not applicableosv-scanner ·n/a: not applicabletrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Caution badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 30 findings across every scanner that examined this package.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 3 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
7 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: YARA_prompt_injection_unicode_steganography, SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/samples/line-stamp-generator/ai-occupied-humans/stamps/stamp_05_roudou_yorokobi.png, /repo/samples/SKILL.md, /repo/samples/line-stamp-generator/ai-occupied-humans/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.
11 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/plugins/line-stamp-generator/skills/00_line_stamp_runner/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/line-stamp-generator/skills/06_stamp_line_resize/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/line-stamp-generator/skills/03_stamp_generation/SKILL.md and 8 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
8 MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME
Files: /repo/plugins/line-stamp-generator/skills/01_stamp_concept/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/line-stamp-generator/skills/00_line_stamp_runner/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/line-stamp-generator/skills/05_stamp_alpha_cleaning/SKILL.md and 5 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 AAK-MARKETPLACE-001
Files: .claude-plugin/marketplace.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
3 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION · Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/line-stamp-generator/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/line-stamp-generator/references/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
High severity findings in core scripts and manifest.
The artifact contains high severity findings in several Python scripts, indicating potential for insecure operations or sensitive data exposure during image processing and validation tasks. Specifically, `bearer` scanner identified issues in scripts such as `generate_image.py` and `validate_metadata.py`. Additionally, a high severity finding from `agent-audit-kit` in `marketplace.json` warrants attention regarding the artifact's manifest configuration.
Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.