crawl-page-mcp-server · Nerlo

AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real: 299
Dismissed as false positives: 7
Not reviewed: 8

Out of 314 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 2 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 8 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

5 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE, opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-run-bundled-artifact · Files: /repo/test/SKILL.md, /repo/docs/SKILL.md, /repo/docs/quick-start.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner, nerlo-install-instruction
2 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: LOW_ANALYZABILITY, DATA_EXFIL_JS_FS_ACCESS · Files: /repo/test, /repo/test/test-windows-compatibility.js · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

6 GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74
Files: /repo/package-lock.json, /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by osv-scanner
6 GHSA-3ppc-4f35-3m26
Files: /repo/package-lock.json, /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by osv-scanner
6 GHSA-7r86-cg39-jmmj
Files: /repo/package-lock.json, /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-2g4f-4pwh-qvx6
Files: /repo/package-lock.json, /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp
Files: /repo/package-lock.json, /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p
Files: /repo/package-lock.json, /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by osv-scanner
4

Not reviewed

4 The model did not answer for these findings.
Rules: CVE-2026-44488, GHSA-fxqj-rqcc-2cmp · Files: package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, /repo/package-lock.json and 1 more · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
4 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: AAK-MCP-ATTEST-001, AAK-SEC-MD-001, SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION and 1 more · Files: mcp-config-example.json, SECURITY.md, /repo/SKILL.md · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner

What the review concluded

Critical dependency vulnerability and network risks.

The artifact has a critical vulnerability in its dependencies, identified in `package-lock.json` and `pnpm-lock.yaml`. It also contains code that could facilitate DNS rebinding attacks, potentially leading to unauthorized network egress or access to internal services. The use of the Anthropic SDK in `src/index.ts` implies network egress for API calls and handling of API credentials.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-3qcw-2rhx-2726 · /repo/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-3qcw-2rhx-2726 · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
AAK-DNS-REBIND-002 · package.json · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
AAK-ANTHROPIC-SDK-001 · src/index.ts · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-25h7-pfq9-p65f · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
· · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

Scan history

1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.

Completed	Composite	Change	Scanners	Status
Aug 20, 2026	Flagged46	—	agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source: completetrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable	completed

Per-scanner history:

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real: 299
Dismissed as false positives: 7
Not reviewed: 8

Out of 314 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 2 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 8 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

5 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE, opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-run-bundled-artifact · Files: /repo/test/SKILL.md, /repo/docs/SKILL.md, /repo/docs/quick-start.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner, nerlo-install-instruction
2 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: LOW_ANALYZABILITY, DATA_EXFIL_JS_FS_ACCESS · Files: /repo/test, /repo/test/test-windows-compatibility.js · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

6 GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74
Files: /repo/package-lock.json, /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by osv-scanner
6 GHSA-3ppc-4f35-3m26
Files: /repo/package-lock.json, /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by osv-scanner
6 GHSA-7r86-cg39-jmmj
Files: /repo/package-lock.json, /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-2g4f-4pwh-qvx6
Files: /repo/package-lock.json, /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp
Files: /repo/package-lock.json, /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by osv-scanner
4 GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p
Files: /repo/package-lock.json, /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · reported by osv-scanner
4

Not reviewed

4 The model did not answer for these findings.
Rules: CVE-2026-44488, GHSA-fxqj-rqcc-2cmp · Files: package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, /repo/package-lock.json and 1 more · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
4 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: AAK-MCP-ATTEST-001, AAK-SEC-MD-001, SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION and 1 more · Files: mcp-config-example.json, SECURITY.md, /repo/SKILL.md · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner

What the review concluded

Critical dependency vulnerability and network risks.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-3qcw-2rhx-2726 · /repo/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-3qcw-2rhx-2726 · /repo/pnpm-lock.yaml · critical · reported by osv-scanner
AAK-DNS-REBIND-002 · package.json · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
AAK-ANTHROPIC-SDK-001 · src/index.ts · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-25h7-pfq9-p65f · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
· · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

crawl-page-mcp-server

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (8)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

nerlo-multi-source

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (3)

capslock

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (8)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

nerlo-multi-source

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (3)

capslock

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged46

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at