gersomsim · Nerlo

AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real: 156
Dismissed as false positives: 2
Not reviewed: 6

Out of 164 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 2 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 6 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

2 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: permissions-no-block, hooks-no-pretooluse · Files: .vscode/settings.json · reported by agentshield

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

2 CVE-2026-33671
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
2 CVE-2026-33672
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
2 GHSA-33hq-fvwr-56pm
Files: /repo/package-lock.json, package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
2 GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-4hxc-9384-m385
Files: package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj
Files: package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-72gr-qfp7-vwhw
Files: package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by trivy, osv-scanner

Not reviewed

6 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: YARA_prompt_injection_unicode_steganography, SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/src/assets/crm.png, /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/src/data/SKILL.md and 1 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

What the review concluded

Critical and high vulnerabilities in dependencies

The artifact includes critical vulnerabilities GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw and CVE-2026-59873, found in its dependencies. Multiple high-severity vulnerabilities, such as CVE-2026-33671 and GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj, are also present. These issues are identified within the installed code, primarily affecting components listed in `package-lock.json`.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2026-59873 · package-lock.json · critical · reported by trivy
GHSA-22cc-p3c6-wpvm · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-28wg-ghj8-5hjv · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-2pvr-wf23-7pc7 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-34x7-hfp2-rc4v · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-52cp-r559-cp3m · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj · · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

Scan history

1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.

Completed	Composite	Change	Scanners	Status
Aug 20, 2026	Flagged48	—	agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable	completed

Per-scanner history:

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real: 156
Dismissed as false positives: 2
Not reviewed: 6

Out of 164 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 2 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 6 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

2 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: permissions-no-block, hooks-no-pretooluse · Files: .vscode/settings.json · reported by agentshield

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

2 CVE-2026-33671
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
2 CVE-2026-33672
Files: package-lock.json · reported by trivy
2 GHSA-33hq-fvwr-56pm
Files: /repo/package-lock.json, package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
2 GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
2 GHSA-4hxc-9384-m385
Files: package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj
Files: package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GHSA-72gr-qfp7-vwhw
Files: package-lock.json, /repo/package-lock.json · reported by trivy, osv-scanner

Not reviewed

6 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: YARA_prompt_injection_unicode_steganography, SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/src/assets/crm.png, /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/src/data/SKILL.md and 1 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

What the review concluded

Critical and high vulnerabilities in dependencies

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
CVE-2026-59873 · package-lock.json · critical · reported by trivy
GHSA-22cc-p3c6-wpvm · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-28wg-ghj8-5hjv · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-2pvr-wf23-7pc7 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-2v37-7h3g-55p8 · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-34x7-hfp2-rc4v · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-52cp-r559-cp3m · /repo/package-lock.json · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj · · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

gersomsim

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged48

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at