k8s-logjedi/k8s.logjedi · Nerlo

AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real: 140
Dismissed as false positives: 15
Not reviewed: 1

Out of 156 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 1 finding rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 1 finding stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

8 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/test.yaml, .github/workflows/ci.yml, .github/workflows/semantic_pr.yaml and 3 more · reported by agent-audit-kit
7 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE, MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME · Files: /repo/.github/SKILL.md, /repo/docs/SKILL.md, /repo/docs/adr/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

In installed code — never dismissed

These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.

2 GHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j
Files: /repo/llm-service/uv.lock, llm-service/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
2 GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf
Files: llm-service/uv.lock, /repo/llm-service/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GO-2026-4918
Files: /repo/operator/go.mod · reported by osv-scanner
2 GO-2026-5026
Files: /repo/operator/go.mod · reported by osv-scanner
2 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/.pre-commit-config.yaml, /repo/.golangci.yml · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/llm-service/deploy/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-39821
Files: operator/go.mod · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-54282
Files: llm-service/uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69248
Files: llm-service/uv.lock · reported by trivy

Not reviewed

1 The model did not answer for these findings.
Rules: FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH · Files: /repo/llm-service/tests/__init__.py · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerability found in installed dependencies

The artifact includes dependencies with a critical vulnerability (PYSEC-2026-36) and numerous high-severity vulnerabilities. These issues are present in the installed code, specifically within the dependency lock file and requirements.txt. Such vulnerabilities could potentially enable remote code execution, information disclosure, or other system compromises.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2026-36 · /repo/llm-service/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2024-38 · /repo/llm-service/requirements.txt · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf · /repo/llm-service/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-120 · /repo/llm-service/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-141 · /repo/llm-service/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-142 · /repo/llm-service/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-179 · /repo/llm-service/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2132 · /repo/llm-service/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
· · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

Scan history

1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.

Completed	Composite	Change	Scanners	Status
Aug 22, 2026	Flagged48	—	agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·!: incompletenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable	completed

Per-scanner history:

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real: 140
Dismissed as false positives: 15
Not reviewed: 1

Out of 156 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 1 finding rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 1 finding stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.

Why those were dismissed

8 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/test.yaml, .github/workflows/ci.yml, .github/workflows/semantic_pr.yaml and 3 more · reported by agent-audit-kit
7 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE, MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME · Files: /repo/.github/SKILL.md, /repo/docs/SKILL.md, /repo/docs/adr/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

In installed code — never dismissed

2 GHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j
Files: /repo/llm-service/uv.lock, llm-service/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
2 GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf
Files: llm-service/uv.lock, /repo/llm-service/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 GO-2026-4918
Files: /repo/operator/go.mod · reported by osv-scanner
2 GO-2026-5026
Files: /repo/operator/go.mod · reported by osv-scanner
2 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/.pre-commit-config.yaml, /repo/.golangci.yml · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/llm-service/deploy/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-39821
Files: operator/go.mod · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-54282
Files: llm-service/uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69248
Files: llm-service/uv.lock · reported by trivy

Not reviewed

1 The model did not answer for these findings.
Rules: FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH · Files: /repo/llm-service/tests/__init__.py · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerability found in installed dependencies

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2026-36 · /repo/llm-service/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2024-38 · /repo/llm-service/requirements.txt · high · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf · /repo/llm-service/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-120 · /repo/llm-service/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-141 · /repo/llm-service/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-142 · /repo/llm-service/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-179 · /repo/llm-service/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-2132 · /repo/llm-service/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
· · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

k8s-logjedi/k8s.logjedi

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

capslock

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

agentshield

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

capslock

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

agentshield

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged48

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

Not reviewed

What the review concluded

What to look at