Loading the registry…
Photo to abstract art via scene graph
Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
1 critical finding reported by osv-scanner. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI. Review the scanned source before copying them into your own project.
nerlo install -- sg-draw
6 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
5 findings · 6.4s
v0.3.74
0 findings · 1.5s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 2.8s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 2.8s
v0.71.0
35 findings · 0.3s
v2.3.8
39 findings · 1.3s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.8s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Flagged48 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 79 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 1 finding rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 5 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.
1 CVE-2025-3000
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-3001
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-66034
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-66418
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-66471
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-68146
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-1839
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-21441
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-22701
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-25645
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-25990
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-28684
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-40192
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-42308
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-42309
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-42310
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-42311
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-4372
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-44431
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-45409
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-5241
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-54058
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-54059
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-54060
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-55379
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-55380
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-55798
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-59197
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-59198
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-59199
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-59200
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-59203
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-59204
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-59205
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-59890
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 GHSA-qfhq-4f3w-5fph
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-rrmf-rvhw-rf47
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 LOW_ANALYZABILITY
Files: /repo · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 PYSEC-2025-217
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2025-218
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1374
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1375
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1389
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-139
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-141
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-165
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1994
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1996
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1998
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-215
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2249
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2250
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2251
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2253
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2254
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2255
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2256
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2257
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2270
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2275
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2286
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2288
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2289
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2290
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2874
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3447
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3451
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3452
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3453
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3454
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3493
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3494
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3495
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3496
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
4 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: YARA_prompt_injection_unicode_steganography, SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/test01.jpg, /repo/test05.jpg, /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 The model did not answer for these findings.
Rules: PYSEC-2026-2252 · Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
Critical dependency vulnerability detected
A critical vulnerability (PYSEC-2026-2290) is present in a dependency listed in `uv.lock`. A high-severity finding from the 'bearer' scanner is also identified within the artifact's own code at `analyzer/pipeline_depth.py`. These and numerous other high-severity vulnerabilities across dependencies warrant immediate attention.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.
Showing 24 of 24; the rest are in the per-scanner reports above.