Loading the registry…
Interactive 3D hoodie texture editor with real-time drawing
Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI. Review the scanned source before copying them into your own project.
nerlo install -- hoodie-texture-editor
5 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
0 findings · 0.8s
v2.0.11
22 findings · 9.2s
v0.3.74
1 finding · 7.6s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 4.0s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 4.0s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 2.0s
v0.71.0
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v2.3.8
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Flagged86 | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy ·n/a: not applicableosv-scanner ·n/a: not applicabletrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 23 findings across every scanner that examined this package.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 20 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.
1 AAK-SUPPLY-004
Files: package.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 LOW_ANALYZABILITY
Files: /repo · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 OVERSIZED_FILE
Files: /repo/src/assets/hoodie_with_hood_up.glb · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
20 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: YARA_prompt_injection_unicode_steganography, UNANALYZABLE_BINARY, SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION and 3 more · Files: /repo/src/assets/tile-2-dark.png, /repo/src/assets/tile-2-light.png, /repo/.DS_Store and 7 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
Artifact contains unanalyzable code
The artifact contains unanalyzable code, including binary components, making its full behavior difficult to determine. This lack of transparency, particularly in `/repo`, raises concerns about hidden functionality. Findings related to prompt injection and unicode steganography suggest potential for obfuscated data or code, which could facilitate unexpected operations or data handling. An identified supply chain risk further indicates potential for unforeseen dependencies or components.
Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.