Loading the registry…
Build a real mobile app (iOS/Android) end-to-end from a plain description of the idea — "build me an app", "make an app that does X", "I have an idea for an app", "turn this into an app" — all the way from idea to something running live on the user's own phone to an App Store/Play Store release. Handles all developer-tooling setup (Node, Homebrew, Xcode/Android Studio, Expo/EAS CLI) automatically or with a single plain-language approval, and never exposes terminal output, jargon, or setup decisions — this matters most for non-technical users, but the skill works for anyone starting a new app from scratch. Use this as the entry point for any "build/make/create a mobile app" request, including from technical users, rather than reaching directly for the narrower expo-* skills (expo-project-structure, expo-router, expo-native-ui, expo-ui, expo-data-fetching, eas-app-stores, eas-simulator, expo-dev-client), which this skill orchestrates. Also use when someone asks about installing Xcode/Android Studio/dev tools for a mobile project.
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
6 critical findings reported by cisco-skill-scanner. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- 'techguy0711/app-maker (mobile-app-builder)'
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- 'techguy0711/app-maker (mobile-app-builder)' ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
5 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
3 findings · 0.6s
v2.0.11
112 findings · 14.4s
v0.3.74
8 findings · 6.2s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.8s
v0.1.0
18 findings · 3.8s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.9s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
This review has not run for this scan yet. It runs once per scan, in the background, and is kept; it appears here when it has. Until then all 141 findings above stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity.