dominican-open-data-mcp · Nerlo

dominican-open-data-mcp

Version: v0.11.0
By: Alberto Castillo Aroca
License: MIT
Last scan: Scanned Aug 11, 2026, 11:02 AM UTC

MCP Server

Flagged23composite

MCP server for datos.gob.do — Dominican Republic open government data portal (CKAN 2.11)

Source:: github.com/alcastaro/datos.gob.do-MCP-server
Version:: 0.11.0
License:: MIT
Author:: Alberto Castillo Aroca
Provenance:: Publisher-attested (provenance, not a security rating)
Registry namespace:: io.github.alcastaro

The publisher performed an authenticated act of publication — proving control of a namespace in the official MCP registry, or appearing in a first-party catalogue an operator curates. That establishes WHO published it. It is not a security finding, and attested artifacts carry Flagged verdicts too.

4 critical findings reported by cisco-skill-scanner. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.

github: https://github.com/alcastaro/datos.gob.do-MCP-server, 72 findings

Install

Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.

nerlo install --target claude-code -- dominican-open-data-mcp

Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.

How scores work Full audit report

Per-scanner reports

10 scanners

Your view:

6 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.

Scanners that examined this package (6)

cisco-skill-scanner
v2.0.11
Flagged0
- 4Crit
- 1High
- 1Med
- 4Low
- 2Info
12 findings · 8.6s

AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real: 66
Dismissed as false positives: 5
Not reviewed: 0

Out of 71 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 4 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

4 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-IPI-WILD-CORPUS-001, AAK-MCP-014, RESOURCE_ABUSE_INFINITE_LOOP · Files: tests/test_analytics.py, tests/test_server_tools.py, tests/test_gcp.py and 1 more · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner
1 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/ci.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit

In installed code — never dismissed

These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.

4 SQL_INJECTION_STRING_FORMAT
Files: /repo/src/datosgobdo_mcp/analytics.py · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 PIPELINE_TAINT_FLOW
Files: /repo/README.es.md, /repo/README.md, /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 GHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j
Files: /repo/uv.lock, uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
2 GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-pipe-to-shell
Files: /repo/README.es.md, /repo/README.md · reported by nerlo-install-instruction
1 AAK-DNS-REBIND-002
Files: pyproject.toml

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-54282
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69248
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Critical SQL injection and shell execution risks identified

The artifact contains critical SQL injection vulnerabilities in `/repo/src/datosgobdo_mcp/analytics.py`, which could allow unauthorized database access. High severity findings include potential shell execution via `pipe-to-shell` instructions in `README.md` and `README.es.md`, and a DNS rebinding vulnerability in `pyproject.toml`. Additionally, numerous high and medium severity vulnerabilities (CVEs and PYSECs) are present in dependencies listed in `uv.lock` and `pyproject.toml`, alongside a medium severity undeclared network access.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

SQL_INJECTION_STRING_FORMAT · /repo/src/datosgobdo_mcp/analytics.py · critical · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
SQL_INJECTION_STRING_FORMAT · /repo/src/datosgobdo_mcp/analytics.py · critical · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
SQL_INJECTION_STRING_FORMAT · /repo/src/datosgobdo_mcp/analytics.py · critical · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
SQL_INJECTION_STRING_FORMAT · /repo/src/datosgobdo_mcp/analytics.py · critical · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
AAK-DNS-REBIND-002 · pyproject.toml · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-pipe-to-shell · /repo/README.es.md · high · reported by nerlo-install-instruction
· · high · reported by nerlo-install-instruction

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

Scan history

1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.

Completed	Composite	Change	Scanners	Status
Aug 11, 2026	Flagged23	—	agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable	completed

Per-scanner history:

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real: 66
Dismissed as false positives: 5
Not reviewed: 0

Out of 71 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 4 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

4 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-IPI-WILD-CORPUS-001, AAK-MCP-014, RESOURCE_ABUSE_INFINITE_LOOP · Files: tests/test_analytics.py, tests/test_server_tools.py, tests/test_gcp.py and 1 more · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner
1 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/ci.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit

In installed code — never dismissed

4 SQL_INJECTION_STRING_FORMAT
Files: /repo/src/datosgobdo_mcp/analytics.py · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 PIPELINE_TAINT_FLOW
Files: /repo/README.es.md, /repo/README.md, /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 GHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j
Files: /repo/uv.lock, uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
2 GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
2 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-pipe-to-shell
Files: /repo/README.es.md, /repo/README.md · reported by nerlo-install-instruction
1 AAK-DNS-REBIND-002
Files: pyproject.toml

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-54282
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69248
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Critical SQL injection and shell execution risks identified

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

SQL_INJECTION_STRING_FORMAT · /repo/src/datosgobdo_mcp/analytics.py · critical · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
SQL_INJECTION_STRING_FORMAT · /repo/src/datosgobdo_mcp/analytics.py · critical · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
SQL_INJECTION_STRING_FORMAT · /repo/src/datosgobdo_mcp/analytics.py · critical · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
SQL_INJECTION_STRING_FORMAT · /repo/src/datosgobdo_mcp/analytics.py · critical · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
AAK-DNS-REBIND-002 · pyproject.toml · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-pipe-to-shell · /repo/README.es.md · high · reported by nerlo-install-instruction
· · high · reported by nerlo-install-instruction

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

dominican-open-data-mcp

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (6)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (5)

agentshield

capslock

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (6)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (5)

agentshield

capslock

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged23

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at