Supporto documentale al progettista (geometra, architetto, ingegnere) e al tecnico incaricato per l'accertamento di conformita' (permesso di costruire o SCIA in sanatoria) degli interventi edilizi abusivi, ai sensi del D.P.R. 6 giugno 2001, n. 380 (Testo unico edilizia), Titolo IV, artt. 36, 36-bis e 37, come modificati dal decreto-legge 69/2024 (salva-casa) convertito dalla legge 105/2024. Aiuta a stabilire quale articolo si applica in base alla qualificazione dell'abuso: assenza di titolo o totale difformita' con doppia conformita' piena, cioe' conformita' urbanistica ed edilizia sia al momento della realizzazione sia al momento della domanda, oblazione pari al contributo di costruzione in misura doppia e decisione in sessanta giorni con silenzio-rifiuto (art. 36); parziale difformita' e variazioni essenziali con la doppia conformita' attenuata introdotta dal salva-casa, cioe' conformita' urbanistica al momento della domanda e requisiti edilizi al momento della realizzazione, la dichiarazione del professionista abilitato che attesta le conformita' e prova l'epoca di realizzazione, gli interventi anche strutturali prescrivibili dallo sportello unico, i profili sismici e paesaggistici, l'oblazione con l'incremento del venti per cento o il doppio del valore venale e la decisione in quarantacinque giorni con silenzio-assenso (art. 36-bis); gli interventi in assenza o difformita' dalla segnalazione certificata di inizio attivita' con la sanzione pecuniaria pari al triplo dell'aumento del valore venale, minimo 1.032 euro, e il rinvio all'accertamento dell'art. 36-bis (art. 37). Use when a surveyor, architect, or engineer must frame the building compliance assessment (permit or SCIA in condono/sanatoria) for unlawful works under D.P.R. 380/2001 as amended by the 2024 salva-casa reform; it is a documentary aid and does NOT draft the application or the compliance statement, does NOT classify the abuse or compute the oblation or venal value, does NOT cover the condono under
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
207 critical findings reported by cisco-skill-scanner, agent-audit-kit, 1 of them in the installed artifact. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- accertamento-conformita-sanatoria-dpr380
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- accertamento-conformita-sanatoria-dpr380 ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
4 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
2035 findings · 129.1s
v0.3.26
227 findings · 47.1s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 24.3s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 24.3s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image, nerlo-multi-source.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
This review has not run for this scan yet. It runs once per scan, in the background, and is kept; it appears here when it has. Until then all 2,262 findings above stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity.