In-place algorithmic work on a narrow target — add a new algorithm, improve an existing one, refactor to the same intent, or evaluate that it should be left alone, scoped to a function, class, or single file. Twin creeds — performance does not exist until a benchmark says it does; correctness does not exist until it survives adversarial refutation. Linear spine — SCOPE (job, contract with guarantees and sync contract, correctness-lens risk scan, tags HOT/COLD CONCURRENT TRUST-BOUNDARY SUSPECT) → PIN (pin the contract before touching anything — PINNED/FLEXIBLE/SUSPECT behavior split, differential + property harness against the current code while it still exists, SUSPECT behaviors adjudicated so a bug is never enshrined as expected) → BASELINE (measured noise — interleaved repetitions with recorded spread, realistic plus worst-case shapes, contended when concurrent, allocation counts, machine profile) → DESIGN (at most 3 candidates, refuted on paper) → IMPLEMENT (in place, red-first, no dual paths) → VERIFY (risk-proportional adversarial ladder, hard cap 2 blind agents, "inline" in the request drops to zero agents with oracles unchanged — edge-hunter on hot or complexity-adding results, race oracle + interleaving-hunter on concurrent ones, the complexity class assigned by whichever hunter runs, boundary enforcement at trust boundaries, zero agents on cold simple paths) → MEASURE (adoption by proportionality; improve reverts on a miss, refactor adopts only if intent is preserved AND nothing regresses AND the code got simpler) → REPORT. Hot paths obey realtime rules — zero steady-state allocations, no hidden allocators, bounded worst case, no blocking. Testing method loads from the test-practice skill; language specifics from a <lang>-toolkit skill (e.g. msvcpp-toolkit) when one exists. Edits land in the existing files; no research fan-out, no parallel implementations. Trigger on "algo-craft", "/algo-craft", "add an algorithm", "implement an algorithm here", "improve th
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- 'yuridevx/yd-skillset (algo-craft)'
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- 'yuridevx/yd-skillset (algo-craft)' ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
4 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
44 findings · 9.4s
v0.3.74
10 findings · 1.9s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 4.3s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 4.3s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.3s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.2s
v0.71.0
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v2.3.8
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2026 | Flagged79 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy ·n/a: not applicableosv-scanner ·n/a: not applicabletrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 54 findings across every scanner that examined this package.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
8 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-AGENT-005 · Files: AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md · reported by agent-audit-kit
These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.
23 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/plugins/yd-skillset/skills/algo-craft/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/yd-skillset/skills/algo-rewrite/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/yd-skillset/skills/harden/SKILL.md and 20 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
14 MANIFEST_DESCRIPTION_TOO_LONG
Files: /repo/plugins/yd-skillset/skills/tdd-rewrite/SKILL.md, /repo/skills/tdd-rewrite/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/yd-skillset/skills/algo-rewrite/SKILL.md and 11 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/.agents/plugins/marketplace.json, /repo/.codex-plugin/plugin.json, /repo/plugins/yd-skillset/.codex-plugin/plugin.json and 1 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/yd-skillset/skills/killset/references/SKILL.md, /repo/skills/killset/references/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 AAK-MARKETPLACE-001
Files: .claude-plugin/marketplace.json, .agents/plugins/marketplace.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
Artifact contains high-risk marketplace configuration files.
The artifact includes marketplace configuration files at `.agents/plugins/marketplace.json` and `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`. These files are flagged by `AAK-MARKETPLACE-001` as high-risk, indicating potential for dynamic loading of external components or network egress. This capability warrants close attention due to the implications for runtime behavior.
Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.