Loading the registry…
Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI. Review the scanned source before copying them into your own project.
nerlo install -- escrow
7 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
0 findings · 0.6s
v2.0.11
5 findings · 7.4s
v0.3.74
2 findings · 1.2s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.4s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.4s
v0.71.0
6 findings · 0.3s
v2.3.8
2 findings · 7.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.8s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2026 | Caution88 | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Caution badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 15 findings across every scanner that examined this package.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
1 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/tests.yaml · reported by agent-audit-kit
These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.
2 GHSA-cq8v-f236-94qc
Files: Cargo.lock · reported by trivy
1 AAK-SUPPLY-005
Files: Cargo.lock · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 CVE-2022-50237
Files: Cargo.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2024-58262
Files: Cargo.lock · reported by trivy
1 DATA_EXFIL_JS_FS_ACCESS
Files: /repo/create-codama-client.ts · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH
Files: /repo/migrations/deploy.ts · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 GHSA-3288-p39f-rqpv
Files: Cargo.lock · reported by trivy
1 GHSA-58qx-3vcg-4xpx
Artifact has file system access and critical vulnerabilities.
The artifact includes code that can access the file system, specifically identified in `/repo/create-codama-client.ts`. A high-severity vulnerability (`GHSA-96hv-2xvq-fx4p`) is present in a dependency listed in `/repo/package-lock.json`. Additionally, multiple medium-severity vulnerabilities and a file magic mismatch are noted.
Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-96hv-2xvq-fx4p
Files: /repo/package-lock.json · reported by osv-scanner
1 GHSA-fjx5-qpf4-xjf2
Files: Cargo.lock · reported by trivy
1 LOW_ANALYZABILITY
Files: /repo · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner