Loading the registry…
MCP Server for Telegram
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
2 critical findings reported by trivy, osv-scanner. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- mcp-telegram
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
6 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
16 findings · 8.0s
v0.3.74
17 findings · 1.9s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.8s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.8s
v0.71.0
30 findings · 0.3s
v2.3.8
32 findings · 1.3s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.9s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Flagged33 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 95 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 2 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 37 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
6 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE, MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME · Files: /repo/.github/SKILL.md, /repo/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.
4 AAK-TAINT-004
Files: src/mcp_telegram/server.py · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001
Files: pyproject.toml, uv.lock · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-MCP-005
Files: mcp_config_updated.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-MCP-006
Files: mcp_config_updated.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-MCP-007
Files: mcp_config_updated.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-MCP-SSRF-001
Files: src/mcp_telegram/server.py · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 CVE-2024-47081
34 The model's answer could not be read.
Rules: CVE-2025-66416, PYSEC-2026-1618, PYSEC-2026-2132 and 22 more · Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock, .github/workflows/test.yml and 7 more · reported by trivy, osv-scanner, agent-audit-kit and 1 more
3 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, HIDDEN_DATA_FILE, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/.pre-commit-config.yaml · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
Critical vulnerabilities and code risks found in artifact dependencies and server logic.
The artifact contains critical vulnerabilities in its dependencies, specifically identified as PYSEC-2026-348 and CVE-2025-43859, which warrant immediate attention. Additionally, high-severity findings indicate potential for tainted data usage within `src/mcp_telegram/server.py` and other vulnerabilities in `pyproject.toml` and `uv.lock`. These issues could lead to various security compromises, including remote code execution or data manipulation.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.
1 CVE-2025-43859
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-50181
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-50182
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-53365
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-54121
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-62727
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-66418
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-34073
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-44431
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-4539
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-45409
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-48710
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-48817
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-48818
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-52869
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-54282
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-59950
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69247
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69248
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 PYSEC-2026-1469
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1616
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1941
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1942
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1994
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1997
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1998
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-1999
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2141
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2275
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2280
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2281
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-248
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-2987
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-348
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3482
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3483
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-35
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3552
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3553
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
1 PYSEC-2026-3554
Files: /repo/uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner
Showing 24 of 24; the rest are in the per-scanner reports above.