Loading the registry…
Use when producing a communication around engineering work: a PR/MR title or description, a review comment or a reply to one, a work item (ticket title, description, or comment), a chat message to a colleague (a DM or a channel post), a message to a stakeholder, an email, a calendar invite, a design doc or a comment on one, a handoff, or a writeup presenting alternatives. Classifies the communication by audience and artifact, then selects and applies the matching lenses from the catalog so the message is tuned to its reader and artifact instead of generic. Cross-cutting: consult it from any phase; it is not a phase itself.
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- 'lucasfugisawa/deliberate-engineering (communication-collaboration-selector)'
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- 'lucasfugisawa/deliberate-engineering (communication-collaboration-selector)' ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
3 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
36 findings · 8.4s
v0.3.74
2 findings · 1.1s
v0.1.0
1 finding · 3.0s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.1.0
No source files this scanner can analyze were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 3.0s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.0s
v0.71.0
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v2.3.8
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2026 | Caution84 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy ·n/a: not applicableosv-scanner ·n/a: not applicabletrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Caution badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 39 findings across every scanner that examined this package.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
5 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE, MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME · Files: /repo/.github/SKILL.md, /repo/docs/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.
23 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/plugins/deliberate-engineering/skills/deliberate-engineering-state/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/deliberate-engineering/skills/deliberate-engineering-voice/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/deliberate-engineering/skills/planning-strategy-selector/SKILL.md and 20 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
6 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/candidates/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/deliberate-engineering/skills/deliberate-engineering-voice/template/SKILL.md and 3 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 MANIFEST_DESCRIPTION_TOO_LONG
Files: /repo/plugins/deliberate-engineering/skills/deliberate-engineering-voice/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/deliberate-engineering/skills/deliberate-engineering-conductor/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 AAK-HEALTHCARE-AI-004
Files: CHANGELOG.md · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-MARKETPLACE-001
Files: .claude-plugin/marketplace.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-install-run-bundled-artifact
Files:
High severity finding related to marketplace configuration.
The artifact contains a high severity finding in `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` related to marketplace configuration. This indicates a potential for the artifact to interact with external services or a marketplace in a manner that requires careful review. Such interactions could involve network egress or data exchange with external endpoints. Further investigation is warranted to understand the scope of these capabilities.
Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.