Loading the registry…
Slack channel ingest + analysis skill. Pulls messages, threads, replies, permalinks, and resolved user names from any Slack channel over a time window using a Slack user token (xoxp-), emits normalized JSONL, then hands off to a recipe (FAQ / daily digest / knowledge-base publish / raw). **Invoke this skill whenever the user mentions Slack in a data/analysis/summary context**, even with minimal input. Trigger phrases include (non-exhaustive): - "슬랙 채널 분석", "슬랙 분석해줘", "슬랙 대화 요약", "슬랙 FAQ", "슬랙 수집", "슬랙 대화 긁어줘", "슬랙 채널 정리", "슬랙 스레드 요약", "슬랙에서 뽑아줘" - "analyze slack", "slack channel summary", "fetch slack", "pull slack history", "ingest slack", "slack to faq", "summarize slack threads" - Any Slack archive URL (https://*.slack.com/archives/C...) or channel ID (C0XXXXXXXX / G0XXXXXXXX) appearing with an analysis/summary/dump intent - Any mention of `xoxp-` token + "channel" When invoked with only a vague instruction (e.g. "슬랙 채널 분석해줘"), DO NOT ask a long list of questions up-front. Instead, read the "Minimal-context invocation" section of SKILL.md and follow its single-consolidated-question protocol. This skill owns the **collection + normalization** layer only. Downstream operations (FAQ, digest, Confluence/Notion/Pika publish) live as recipes in `recipes/` — read the matching recipe file after collection.
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- seo-junho/slack-digest
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- seo-junho/slack-digest ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
4 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
18 findings · 11.0s
v0.3.74
2 findings · 1.3s
v0.1.0
1 finding · 4.5s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 4.5s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.3s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.2s
v0.71.0
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.3s
v2.3.8
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2026 | Flagged57 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy ·n/a: not applicableosv-scanner ·n/a: not applicabletrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
This review has not run for this scan yet. It runs once per scan, in the background, and is kept; it appears here when it has. Until then all 21 findings above stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity.