Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
6 critical findings reported by cisco-skill-scanner. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI. Review the scanned source before copying them into your own project.
nerlo install -- note-taker
5 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
0 findings · 1.2s
v2.0.11
183 findings · 18.1s
v0.3.74
0 findings · 2.1s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 4.7s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 4.7s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 2.0s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 183 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 6 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 108 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
3 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.
50 LOW_ANALYZABILITY
Files: /repo/node_modules/depd, /repo/node_modules/safer-buffer, /repo/node_modules/iconv-lite and 47 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
12 DATA_EXFIL_JS_FS_ACCESS
Files: /repo/server.js, /repo/node_modules/mime/mime.js, /repo/public/server.js and 2 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
6 COMMAND_INJECTION_EVAL
Files: /repo/node_modules/proxy-addr/index.js, /repo/node_modules/depd/index.js · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/node_modules/.bin/mime.ps1, /repo/node_modules/.bin/mime, /repo/node_modules/.bin/mime.cmd · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 EXCESSIVE_FILE_COUNT
Files: /repo/. · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
108 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, HIDDEN_DATA_FILE, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE and 1 more · Files: /repo/node_modules/safe-buffer/SKILL.md, /repo/node_modules/serve-static/SKILL.md, /repo/node_modules/inherits/SKILL.md and 51 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
Critical command injection and data exfiltration risks.
Critical command injection vulnerabilities are present in `node_modules/depd` and `node_modules/proxy-addr`. High severity findings indicate potential data exfiltration through file system access in `node_modules/mime`. Several modules also exhibit low analyzability, which impedes a full security assessment.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Showing 24 of 24; the rest are in the per-scanner reports above.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.