AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real

153

Dismissed as false positives

Not reviewed

Out of 155 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 1 finding rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

2 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/src/vertex/prompt_optimizer/docs/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

In installed code — never dismissed

These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.

10 FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH
Files: /repo/commands/vertex/delete_prompt.toml, /repo/commands/vertex/write_data_driven_optimize_config.toml, /repo/commands/vertex/generate_html_report.toml and 7 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/.prettierrc.json, /repo/.gitconfig, /repo/.pre-commit-config.yaml · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001
Files: pyproject.toml, uv.lock · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 GHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j
Files: /repo/uv.lock, uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
2 GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
1 CVE-2025-66416
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-66418
Files: uv.lock

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-54282
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69248
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Critical and high severity vulnerabilities detected in dependencies.

The artifact includes dependencies with a critical vulnerability (PYSEC-2026-36) identified in `/repo/uv.lock`. Additionally, numerous high severity vulnerabilities are present, including AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001 found in `pyproject.toml` and `uv.lock`. These findings indicate potential for various security impacts, such as remote code execution, privilege escalation, or information disclosure, depending on the specific vulnerability.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2026-36 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001 · pyproject.toml · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001 · uv.lock · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2025-183 · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-120 · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-141 · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-1617 · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-179 · · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real

153

Dismissed as false positives

Not reviewed

Out of 155 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 1 finding rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

2 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/src/vertex/prompt_optimizer/docs/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

In installed code — never dismissed

10 FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH
Files: /repo/commands/vertex/delete_prompt.toml, /repo/commands/vertex/write_data_driven_optimize_config.toml, /repo/commands/vertex/generate_html_report.toml and 7 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
3 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/.prettierrc.json, /repo/.gitconfig, /repo/.pre-commit-config.yaml · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001
Files: pyproject.toml, uv.lock · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 GHSA-4xgf-cpjx-pc3j
Files: /repo/uv.lock, uv.lock · reported by osv-scanner, trivy
2 GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf
Files: uv.lock, /repo/uv.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
1 CVE-2025-66416
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2025-66418
Files: uv.lock

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 CVE-2026-54282
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy
1 CVE-2026-69248
Files: uv.lock · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Critical and high severity vulnerabilities detected in dependencies.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

PYSEC-2026-36 · /repo/uv.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001 · pyproject.toml · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
AAK-MCP-SDK-CVE-2026-52869-001 · uv.lock · high · reported by agent-audit-kit
GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2025-183 · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-120 · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-141 · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-1617 · /repo/uv.lock · high · reported by osv-scanner
PYSEC-2026-179 · · high · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

Completed	Composite	Change	Scanners	Status
Sep 3, 2026	Flagged39	—	agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable	completed
Jul 30, 2026	Flagged42	—	cisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicable	completed
Jul 26, 2026	Scan Halted	—	agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: complete	rejected

vertex

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (6)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (5)

agentshield

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (6)

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (5)

agentshield

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged39

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at