Loading the registry…
A2A TrustGate CLI — Safety, compliance, and governance for AI agents. Screen every action before it executes.
The publisher performed an authenticated act of publication — proving control of a namespace in the official MCP registry, or appearing in a first-party catalogue an operator curates. That establishes WHO published it. It is not a security finding, and attested artifacts carry Flagged verdicts too.
9 critical findings reported by cisco-skill-scanner, 0 of them in the installed artifact. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
This artifact ships from 2 sources and their verdicts differ. The worst is github (Flagged). Installing from a cleaner source does not mean the others are safe — check the source you actually install from.
github: https://github.com/jyswee/a2a-trustgate, 55 findings
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- a2a-trustgate
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
6 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
0 findings · 2.6s
v2.0.11
47 findings · 21.6s
v0.3.26
6 findings · 4.1s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 36.0s
v0.1.0
2 findings · 36.0s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 25.1s
No report in this scan: capslock, govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completenerlo-multi-source: complete | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 55 findings across every scanner that examined this package. 9 of 9 findings rated critical by their scanner were among the dismissals.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
51 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: YARA_prompt_injection_generic, YARA_credential_harvesting_generic, YARA_command_injection_generic and 11 more · Files: /repo/examples/corpus/prompt-injections.jsonl, /repo/examples/ai-agents/rogue-messages.txt, /repo/examples/corpus/commands.jsonl and 19 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner, nerlo-install-instruction, agent-audit-kit
These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.
1 AAK-SEC-MD-001
Files: SECURITY.md · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-SUPPLY-004
Files: package.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
Artifact has medium-severity supply chain and security findings.
The artifact contains a medium-severity supply chain finding (AAK-SUPPLY-004) which may indicate risks related to its build process or dependencies. A low-severity security finding (AAK-SEC-MD-001) is also present, suggesting potential code-level vulnerabilities. Additionally, informational findings note a vague description and a missing license in the manifest.
Concern level assessed by the review: Medium. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.