Loading the registry…
MUST USE when user wants to 调研/research/搜索/search/查/找/look up anything on the internet — e.g. 全网调研 X / 帮我调研一下 X / 查一下 X / 搜搜 X / 看看大家怎么评价 X / X 上有什么讨论 / research this topic。 Also MUST USE when user mentions any platform or shares any URL/链接: 小红书/xiaohongshu/xhs, Twitter/推特/X, B站/bilibili, Reddit, V2EX, LinkedIn/领英/招聘/求职/jobs, YouTube, GitHub code search, 小宇宙播客, 雪球/股票行情, RSS feeds, or any web URL. 13 platforms, multi-backend routing (OpenCLI / per-platform CLIs / APIs). Zero config for 6 channels. Run `agent-reach doctor --json` to see which backend serves each platform right now. NOT for: 写报告/数据分析/翻译等内容加工（本 skill 只负责从互联网获取内容）； 发帖/评论/点赞等写操作；已有专门 skill 的平台（先用专门 skill）。 【路由方式】SKILL.md 包含路由表和常用命令，复杂场景需按需阅读对应分类的 references/*.md。 分类：search / social (小红书/推特/B站/V2EX/Reddit) / career(LinkedIn) / dev(github) / web(网页/文章/RSS) / video(YouTube/B站/播客)。
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- 'ootto-ai/claude-content-skills (agent-reach)'
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- 'ootto-ai/claude-content-skills (agent-reach)' ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
4 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
4 findings · 13.6s
v0.3.74
1 finding · 1.5s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 5.8s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 5.8s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.3s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.5s
v0.71.0
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.3s
v2.3.8
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2026 | Caution95 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy ·n/a: not applicableosv-scanner ·n/a: not applicabletrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Caution badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
This review has not run for this scan yet. It runs once per scan, in the background, and is kept; it appears here when it has. Until then all 5 findings above stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity.