Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
3 critical findings reported by cisco-skill-scanner, agent-audit-kit, 0 of them in the installed artifact. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Cursor Rules are .cursorrules / .cursor/rules files that steer Cursor's AI. Review the scanned source before copying them into your own project.
nerlo install -- bluesky-digital-labs/skill-testing-system
4 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
169 findings · 29.0s
v0.3.74
3 findings · 19.7s
v0.1.0
2 findings · 8.0s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 8.0s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.1s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 174 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 3 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 169 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.
3 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/frontend/SKILL.md, /repo/backend/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 EXCESSIVE_FILE_COUNT
Files: /repo/backend/., /repo/frontend/. · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
169 The review call did not complete.
Rules: YARA_script_injection_generic, AAK-INDIA-PII-001, SECRET_CONNECTION_STRING and 11 more · Files: /repo/frontend/src/utils/sanitizeHtml.test.ts, frontend/src/pages/tests/assign/__tests__/TestAssignPage.test.tsx, /repo/backend/src/core/settings/__init__.py and 45 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner, agent-audit-kit, nerlo-behavioral
Critical script injection, PII handling, and secret egress risks.
Critical findings indicate potential for script injection and issues with sensitive data handling in authentication and user registration flows. PII handling is flagged in `TestAssignPage.test.tsx`, and secrets may be exposed in configuration files or sent over the network from `candidates.ts` and `http.ts`. A hidden executable script is also present in `.sunset/validate_deploy_contract.py`.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.