Loading the registry…
Discovers and judges new backlog phases for a project's ROADMAP.md like an owner-manager — runs a convergent/emergent research playbook (vision-gap, trend/competitive research, domain-practice and academic scans, stewardship inspection of dependencies/config/docs/repo hygiene, telemetry reuse, active dogfooding, plus emergent sessions rotated in by symptom) on a persistent per-activity cadence, then synthesizes the findings into a state-of-the-product diagnosis, an evidence-grounded importance ranking, and a dependency-ordered now/next/later staging toward the vision. Always produces a proposal document for human review; never merges into ROADMAP.md automatically.
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- 'iyulab/claude-plugins (backlog-discover)'
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- 'iyulab/claude-plugins (backlog-discover)' ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
3 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
26 findings · 8.9s
v0.3.74
11 findings · 1.2s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.2s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.1.0
No source files this scanner can analyze were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 3.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.1s
v0.71.0
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.3s
v2.3.8
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2026 | Flagged59 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy ·n/a: not applicableosv-scanner ·n/a: not applicabletrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 37 findings across every scanner that examined this package.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
2 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH, AAK-HEALTHCARE-AI-004 · Files: /repo/CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner, agent-audit-kit
These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.
16 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/plugins/iyu/skills/run-cycle/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/iyu/skills/ship/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/iyu/skills/backlog-discover/SKILL.md and 13 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
8 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/iyu/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/iyu/skills/_shared/SKILL.md and 5 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
5 AAK-HEALTHCARE-AI-004
Files: CHANGELOG.md, plugins/iyu/README.md, plugins/iyu/skills/run-cycle/SKILL.md and 2 more · reported by agent-audit-kit
4 AAK-IPI-WILD-CORPUS-001
Files: plugins/iyu/skills/run-cycle/SKILL.md, plugins/iyu/skills/_shared/continuity-docs.md, plugins/iyu/skills/backlog-discover/SKILL.md and 1 more · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-MARKETPLACE-001
Files: .claude-plugin/marketplace.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME
Files: /repo/plugins/iyu/skills/_shared/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
Artifact contains high-severity findings.
The artifact includes high-severity findings related to an IPI Wild Corpus in multiple skill definition files, specifically `plugins/iyu/skills/_shared/continuity-docs.md`, `plugins/iyu/skills/backlog-discover/SKILL.md`, `plugins/iyu/skills/run-cycle/SKILL.md`, and `plugins/iyu/skills/telemetry-az/SKILL.md`. Additionally, a high-severity finding exists in `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` concerning marketplace integration. These findings indicate potential risks associated with data handling or external interactions within the artifact's core functionality.
Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.