AI agent skills, MCP server, and plugin manifests for integrating Bunny into your app
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
4 critical findings reported by agent-audit-kit, 0 of them in the installed artifact. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- bunny-ai-toolkit
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
4 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
Incomplete run
0 findings · 0.6s
v2.0.11
21 findings · 7.2s
v0.3.74
26 findings · 0.9s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 3.2s
v0.1.0
No source files this scanner can analyze were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 3.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 2.0s
v0.71.0
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v2.3.8
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
2 scans on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | Flagged61 | — | agentshield ·!: incompletecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy ·n/a: not applicableosv-scanner ·n/a: not applicabletrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
| Aug 4, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-install-instruction: completenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicable | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 47 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 4 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
5 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-AGENT-002, AAK-AGENT-004 · Files: AGENTS.md · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: AAK-GHA-IMMUTABLE-001 · Files: .github/workflows/link-check.yml · reported by agent-audit-kit
These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.
16 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/template/SKILL.md, /repo/skills/bunny-agent-changes/SKILL.md, /repo/skills/bunny-components/SKILL.md and 13 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4 AAK-MCP-007
Files: .mcp.json, mcp.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
4 AAK-SKILL-003
Files: skills/bunny-components/SKILL.md, skills/bunny-webhooks/SKILL.md, skills/bunny-graphql/SKILL.md and 1 more · reported by agent-audit-kit
4 AAK-SUPPLY-001
Files: .mcp.json, mcp.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
4 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/.cursor-plugin/plugin.json, /repo/.pre-commit-config.yaml, /repo/.cursor-plugin/marketplace.json and 1 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 AAK-MARKETPLACE-001
Files: .cursor-plugin/marketplace.json, .claude-plugin/marketplace.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 AAK-MCP-005
Files: .mcp.json, mcp.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 AAK-MCP-ATTEST-001
Files: .mcp.json, mcp.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-SEC-MD-001
Files: SECURITY.md · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-SUPPLY-004
Files: package.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
Critical capabilities defined; supply chain and marketplace configurations require review.
The artifact defines critical capabilities in multiple skill manifests, which could permit broad system interaction. High severity findings indicate potential supply chain configuration issues in `.mcp.json` and `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` files. These configurations may affect how the artifact is sourced or interacts with external services. Further review of these definitions is warranted.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.