cloudhoppr/riskyrag (react-architect) · Nerlo

cloudhoppr/riskyrag (react-architect)

Last scan: Scanned Aug 21, 2026, 9:46 PM UTC

Claude Skill

Flagged31composite

Design React component architecture, UI flows, and state management for RiskyRag. Trigger this when the user asks to "design a view", "plan a component", or "structure the frontend".

Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.

Source:: github.com/cloudhoppr/riskyrag
Provenance:: Found by crawling (provenance, not a security rating)

We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.

12 critical findings reported by trivy, osv-scanner. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.

Install

Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.

nerlo install -- 'cloudhoppr/riskyrag (react-architect)'

Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.

cp -r -- 'cloudhoppr/riskyrag (react-architect)' ~/.claude/skills/

Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.

How scores work Full audit report

Per-scanner reports

11 scanners

Your view:

7 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.

Scanners that examined this package (7)

agentshield
v1.4.0
Clean100
- No findings
0 findings · 0.5s
cisco-skill-scanner
v2.0.11
Flagged0
- 6High
- 132Med
- 18Low
- 9Info
165 findings · 21.2s

AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real: 606
Dismissed as false positives: 14
Not reviewed: 0

Out of 620 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 12 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

8 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK, SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/riskyrag/src/routes/demo/start.api-request.tsx, /repo/riskyrag/src/routes/demo/tanstack-query.tsx, /repo/riskyrag/docs/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-AGENT-002, TOOL_ABUSE_UNDECLARED_NETWORK · Files: CLAUDE.md, /repo/repo/CLAUDE.md · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner
2 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: DATA_EXFIL_JS_FS_ACCESS · Files: /repo/riskyrag/src/routes/demo/sentry.testing.tsx · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

In installed code — never dismissed

These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.

98 YARA_prompt_injection_unicode_steganography
Files: /repo/preview/01-game-board.png, /repo/preview/02-ai-negotiation.png, /repo/preview/03-tool-usage-dashboard.png and 7 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
15 DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK
Files: /repo/riskyrag/convex/agent.ts, /repo/riskyrag/convex/rag.ts · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
11 FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH
Files: /repo/riskyrag/convex/_generated/api.js, /repo/preview/03-tool-usage-dashboard.txt, /repo/preview/05-scenario-selection.txt and 2 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
8 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/.claude/skills/ui-ux-design/SKILL.md, /repo/.claude/skills/react-architect/SKILL.md, /repo/SKILL.md and 5 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
6 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/riskyrag/.vercel/README.txt, /repo/riskyrag/.vercel/project.json, /repo/riskyrag/.cta.json · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

3 CVE-2026-11525
Files: riskyrag/bun.lock, riskyrag/package-lock.json · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and potential secret network egress detected.

The artifact contains critical vulnerabilities in its dependencies, identified across multiple lock files such as bun.lock, package-lock.json, and uv.lock. Additionally, high-severity findings indicate potential network egress with secrets from files like /repo/riskyrag/convex/agent.ts and /repo/riskyrag/convex/rag.ts. Several high-severity vulnerabilities in dependencies also warrant attention, as do areas of low analyzability within the codebase.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-5xrq-8626-4rwp · /repo/riskyrag/bun.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-mv8w-475r-vwqw · /repo/riskyrag/bun.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-mv8w-475r-vwqw · /repo/riskyrag/bun.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-w7jw-789q-3m8p · /repo/riskyrag/bun.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-5xrq-8626-4rwp · /repo/riskyrag/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-mv8w-475r-vwqw · /repo/riskyrag/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-mv8w-475r-vwqw · /repo/riskyrag/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-w7jw-789q-3m8p · · critical · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

Scan history

1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.

Completed	Composite	Change	Scanners	Status
Aug 21, 2026	Flagged31	—	agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable	completed

Per-scanner history:

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real: 606
Dismissed as false positives: 14
Not reviewed: 0

Out of 620 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 12 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

8 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK, SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/riskyrag/src/routes/demo/start.api-request.tsx, /repo/riskyrag/src/routes/demo/tanstack-query.tsx, /repo/riskyrag/docs/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-AGENT-002, TOOL_ABUSE_UNDECLARED_NETWORK · Files: CLAUDE.md, /repo/repo/CLAUDE.md · reported by agent-audit-kit, cisco-skill-scanner
2 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: DATA_EXFIL_JS_FS_ACCESS · Files: /repo/riskyrag/src/routes/demo/sentry.testing.tsx · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

In installed code — never dismissed

98 YARA_prompt_injection_unicode_steganography
Files: /repo/preview/01-game-board.png, /repo/preview/02-ai-negotiation.png, /repo/preview/03-tool-usage-dashboard.png and 7 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
15 DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK
Files: /repo/riskyrag/convex/agent.ts, /repo/riskyrag/convex/rag.ts · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
11 FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH
Files: /repo/riskyrag/convex/_generated/api.js, /repo/preview/03-tool-usage-dashboard.txt, /repo/preview/05-scenario-selection.txt and 2 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
8 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/.claude/skills/ui-ux-design/SKILL.md, /repo/.claude/skills/react-architect/SKILL.md, /repo/SKILL.md and 5 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
6 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/riskyrag/.vercel/README.txt, /repo/riskyrag/.vercel/project.json, /repo/riskyrag/.cta.json · reported by cisco-skill-scanner

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

3 CVE-2026-11525
Files: riskyrag/bun.lock, riskyrag/package-lock.json · reported by trivy

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and potential secret network egress detected.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-5xrq-8626-4rwp · /repo/riskyrag/bun.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-mv8w-475r-vwqw · /repo/riskyrag/bun.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-mv8w-475r-vwqw · /repo/riskyrag/bun.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-w7jw-789q-3m8p · /repo/riskyrag/bun.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-5xrq-8626-4rwp · /repo/riskyrag/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-mv8w-475r-vwqw · /repo/riskyrag/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-mv8w-475r-vwqw · /repo/riskyrag/package-lock.json · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-w7jw-789q-3m8p · · critical · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

cloudhoppr/riskyrag (react-architect)

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged31

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at