MCP server for the Google Search Console API — search analytics, sitemaps, URL inspection and site management. For Claude, Cursor, Codex and other AI clients.
The publisher performed an authenticated act of publication — proving control of a namespace in the official MCP registry, or appearing in a first-party catalogue an operator curates. That establishes WHO published it. It is not a security finding, and attested artifacts carry Flagged verdicts too.
115 critical findings reported by agent-audit-kit, 0 of them in the installed artifact. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
github: https://github.com/A1-x-Tech/mcp-google-search-console, 143 findings
Choose your runtime: the CLI writes the mcpServers config entry for that target.
nerlo install --target claude-code -- mcp-google-search-console
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
7 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
1 finding · 0.6s
v2.0.11
6 findings · 6.5s
v0.3.26
131 findings · 0.9s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 4.4s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 4.4s
v0.71.0
0 findings · 0.2s
v2.3.8
0 findings · 7.8s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
No report in this scan: nerlo-multi-source.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2026 | Flagged88 | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicabletrivy: completeosv-scanner: completetrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 138 findings across every scanner that examined this package. 115 of 115 findings rated critical by their scanner were among the dismissals.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
118 Agent instruction file — The match is in a file that instructs an AI coding agent — a CLAUDE.md or similar. It is documentation of intent, and our own check confirmed it is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-AGENT-001, AAK-AGENT-002, secrets-claude-md-env-1041 · Files: CLAUDE.md · reported by agent-audit-kit, agentshield
3 Test or fixture file — The match is in a test or fixture. Our own check confirmed the file is not part of what gets installed.
Rules: AAK-ANTHROPIC-SDK-001, AAK-OAUTH-005, AAK-MCP-018 · Files: test/dist-smoke.test.js, src/client.test.ts, src/telemetry.test.ts · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/docs/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.
6 AAK-MCP-018
Files: src/telemetry.ts, src/index.ts, src/tools/analytics.ts and 3 more · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-ANTHROPIC-SDK-001
Files: src/index.ts · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-OAUTH-005
Files: src/client.ts · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-OAUTH-3P-001
Files: package.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-SEC-MD-001
Files: SECURITY.md · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 AAK-TAINT-003
Files: src/telemetry.ts · reported by agent-audit-kit
1 DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK
Files: /repo/src/client.ts · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 LOW_ANALYZABILITY
Files: /repo · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
Artifact uses AI SDK and has data flow concerns
The artifact uses the Anthropic SDK in `src/index.ts`, which may involve network egress for AI model interaction. A high-severity data flow finding in `src/telemetry.ts` indicates potential for sensitive data to be processed or transmitted. Additionally, multiple medium-severity findings relate to OAuth usage and credential management, suggesting potential for credential access or misuse.
Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.