AI review of these findings

Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.

Upheld as real

392

Dismissed as false positives

Not reviewed

Out of 406 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 15 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.

12 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/content/cartesia-php/docs/SKILL.md, /repo/content/cartesia-php/docs/guides/SKILL.md, /repo/content/cartesia-php/docs/api-reference/SKILL.md and 3 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: permissions-no-block, hooks-no-pretooluse · Files: .vscode/settings.json · reported by agentshield

In installed code — never dismissed

These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.

5 DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK
Files: /repo/server/api/github/contents/[...slug].js, /repo/server/api/github/tags/[...slug].js, /repo/server/api/github/user/[username].js and 1 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4 GHSA-r292-9mhp-454m
Files: yarn.lock, /repo/yarn.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
3 CVE-2026-26996
Files: yarn.lock · reported by trivy
3 CVE-2026-27903
Files: yarn.lock · reported by trivy
3 CVE-2026-27904
Files: yarn.lock · reported by trivy
3 GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74
Files: /repo/yarn.lock · reported by osv-scanner

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 GHSA-mwv9-gp5h-frr4
Files: yarn.lock · reported by trivy
1 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-js-secret-to-network-egress
Files: /repo/server/api/github/docs/[...slug].js · reported by nerlo-behavioral

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and potential credential exposure detected

This artifact contains multiple critical vulnerabilities identified in its dependencies, primarily within the `yarn.lock` file. Additionally, high-severity findings indicate that secrets may be exposed to network egress operations in API handling files, specifically `/repo/server/api/github/contents/[...slug].js`, `/repo/server/api/github/docs/[...slug].js`, and `/repo/server/api/github/user/[username].js`. A high-severity finding also points to a potential argument injection vulnerability in `assets/js/prism.js`.

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/yarn.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/yarn.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-279x-mwfv-vcqv · /repo/yarn.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4 · /repo/yarn.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-hffm-xvc3-vprc · /repo/yarn.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-j82m-pc2v-2484 · /repo/yarn.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-r275-fr43-pm7q · /repo/yarn.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-w7jw-789q-3m8p · /repo/yarn.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

AI review of these findings

Upheld as real

392

Dismissed as false positives

Not reviewed

Out of 406 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 15 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.

Why those were dismissed

12 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/content/cartesia-php/docs/SKILL.md, /repo/content/cartesia-php/docs/guides/SKILL.md, /repo/content/cartesia-php/docs/api-reference/SKILL.md and 3 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 CI or editor configuration — The match is in build, CI or editor configuration, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: permissions-no-block, hooks-no-pretooluse · Files: .vscode/settings.json · reported by agentshield

In installed code — never dismissed

5 DATA_EXFIL_JS_NETWORK
Files: /repo/server/api/github/contents/[...slug].js, /repo/server/api/github/tags/[...slug].js, /repo/server/api/github/user/[username].js and 1 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4 GHSA-r292-9mhp-454m
Files: yarn.lock, /repo/yarn.lock · reported by trivy, osv-scanner
3 CVE-2026-26996
Files: yarn.lock · reported by trivy
3 CVE-2026-27903
Files: yarn.lock · reported by trivy
3 CVE-2026-27904
Files: yarn.lock · reported by trivy
3 GHSA-23c5-xmqv-rm74
Files: /repo/yarn.lock · reported by osv-scanner

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.

1 GHSA-mwv9-gp5h-frr4
Files: yarn.lock · reported by trivy
1 opt.nerlo-rules.nerlo-js-secret-to-network-egress
Files: /repo/server/api/github/docs/[...slug].js · reported by nerlo-behavioral

What the review concluded

Critical vulnerabilities and potential credential exposure detected

Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.

What to look at

GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/yarn.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw · /repo/yarn.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-279x-mwfv-vcqv · /repo/yarn.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4 · /repo/yarn.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-hffm-xvc3-vprc · /repo/yarn.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-j82m-pc2v-2484 · /repo/yarn.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-r275-fr43-pm7q · /repo/yarn.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner
GHSA-w7jw-789q-3m8p · /repo/yarn.lock · critical · reported by osv-scanner

Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.

ombabyom-webapp

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Install

Per-scanner reports

Scanners that examined this package (7)

agentshield

cisco-skill-scanner

agent-audit-kit

nerlo-skill-scanner (behavioral)

nerlo-skill-scanner (install-doc)

trivy

osv-scanner

Scanners that did not run on this package (4)

capslock

nerlo-multi-source

trivy (image)

govulncheck

Composite scoreOne view among many — the per-scanner reports above are primaryFlagged39

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at

Scan history

AI review of these findings

Why those were dismissed

In installed code — never dismissed

Upheld — the review declined to dismiss these

What the review concluded

What to look at