Loading the registry…
Create, expand, reorganize, and maintain repository documentation with deep coverage across README files, browsable docs, API/reference pages, llms.txt, llms-full.txt, changelogs, and repo-local agent skills. Use whenever the user asks for comprehensive project documentation, documentation refreshes, LLM-friendly docs, documentation synchronization after code changes, or agent guidance that teaches future LLMs how to use the project docs.
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- deep-documentation
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- deep-documentation ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
4 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v1.4.0
0 findings · 0.4s
v2.0.11
18 findings · 6.2s
v0.3.74
4 findings · 0.8s
v0.2.0
0 findings · 3.2s
v0.2.0
No source files this scanner can analyze were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 3.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
v0.1.0
This scanner found nothing in this artifact that it assesses. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 1.1s
v0.71.0
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v2.3.8
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
2 scans on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2026 | Flagged78 | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy ·n/a: not applicableosv-scanner ·n/a: not applicabletrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
| Jul 28, 2026 | Flagged77 | — | agentshield: completecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-install-instruction: completenerlo-multi-source ·n/a: not applicabletrivy ·n/a: not applicableosv-scanner ·n/a: not applicabletrivy_image ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 22 findings across every scanner that examined this package.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 1 finding stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
Two keys had to turn. The model had to name a reason from a fixed list of six, and a deterministic check of ours — over which files this artifact actually installs — had to independently agree. Anything it could not corroborate is in “not reviewed” above, at full severity.
2 Documentation or example — The match is in documentation or sample code, confirmed by our own check to be outside the installed artifact.
Rules: SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/docs/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
These findings are in files this artifact installs and are not placeholder values. No false-positive basis can be corroborated for such a finding, so this review never dismisses one; they were not sent to the model and stand at their scanner's severity.
5 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/.gemini/agents/deep-documentation.md, /repo/plugins/deep-documentation/.codex-plugin/plugin.json, /repo/.agents/plugins/marketplace.json and 2 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
5 MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE
Files: /repo/truthful-coder/SKILL.md, /repo/deep-documentation/SKILL.md, /repo/SKILL.md and 2 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
4 AAK-MARKETPLACE-001
Files: .claude-plugin/marketplace.json, .agents/plugins/marketplace.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 FILE_MAGIC_MISMATCH
Files: /repo/llms-full.txt, /repo/llms.txt · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
2 SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION
Files: /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/.claude/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 MANIFEST_INVALID_NAME
Files: /repo/.claude/SKILL.md · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
1 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: HIDDEN_DATA_FILE · Files: /repo/.gemini/settings.example.json · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
High severity findings in marketplace configuration files
The artifact contains high severity findings related to marketplace configuration within `.agents/plugins/marketplace.json` and `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`. These findings indicate potential issues with how the artifact interacts with external services or loads dynamic content. Further investigation is warranted to understand the specific capabilities and risks associated with these configurations.
Concern level assessed by the review: High. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.