Loading the registry…
Format an article (e.g. an AIHR.com blog post) into a single markdown file where the whole article body sits inside one ```diff code block, with pre-marked changes shown as red (removed, `-`) and green (added, `+`) lines. The file gets a title, a short voice-over intro explaining the changes, then the full wrapped diff block. TRIGGERS: "turn this article into a diff block", "diff-block markdown", "article diff md", "export article as a git diff", "show the changes as red/green in one code block", "/article-diff-md". This skill is purely the DELIVERY / FORMATTING mechanism. It does NOT decide what edits to make — the caller (or a separate skill) supplies the article text with the changes already marked. This skill only fetches/cleans the article, wraps it in one diff block, hard-wraps lines, writes the intro, and outputs the .md file.
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
4 critical findings reported by cisco-skill-scanner, agent-audit-kit. The composite score alone does not reflect this — read the per-scanner reports below.
This artifact ships from 2 sources and their verdicts differ. The worst is github (Flagged). Installing from a cleaner source does not mean the others are safe — check the source you actually install from.
github: https://github.com/aihr1/seo-article-refresh-plugin, 25 findings
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- 'aihr1/seo-article-refresh-plugin (article-diff-md)'
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- 'aihr1/seo-article-refresh-plugin (article-diff-md)' ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
5 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
15 findings · 6.6s
v0.3.74
8 findings · 0.9s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 2.7s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 2.7s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 6.5s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
No report in this scan: govulncheck, osv-scanner, trivy, trivy_image.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | Scan Halted | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral: completenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-multi-source: complete | rejected |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Flagged badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
Out of 23 findings across every scanner that examined this package. None of the 4 findings rated critical by their scanner were dismissed.
Not reviewed is not the same as clean. Those 13 findings stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity, as they would have without this review.
The model could have called any of these a false positive and did not.
3 AAK-MCP-001
Files: plugins/seo-article-audit/.mcp.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
3 AAK-MCP-ATTEST-001
Files: plugins/seo-article-audit/.mcp.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 AAK-MARKETPLACE-001
Files: .claude-plugin/marketplace.json, .agents/plugins/marketplace.json · reported by agent-audit-kit
2 HIDDEN_DATA_FILE
Files: /repo/.agents/plugins/marketplace.json, /repo/plugins/seo-article-audit/.codex-plugin/plugin.json · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
13 The model called these false positives and our own check did not agree, so the dismissal was refused.
Rules: COMPOUND_FIND_EXEC, SOCIAL_ENG_VAGUE_DESCRIPTION, MANIFEST_MISSING_LICENSE · Files: /repo/scripts/package-cowork-plugin.sh, /repo/SKILL.md, /repo/plugins/seo-article-audit/skills/seo-strategy-execution/references/SKILL.md and 7 more · reported by cisco-skill-scanner
Critical shell execution and sensitive data exposure found.
The artifact contains critical findings for shell execution in `/repo/scripts/package-cowork-plugin.sh` and sensitive configuration exposure in `plugins/seo-article-audit/.mcp.json`. High severity findings also indicate sensitive configuration exposure in marketplace-related JSON files and potential credential exposure in `/repo/plugins/seo-article-audit/skills/article-diff-md/scripts/wrap_diff.py`. These findings warrant careful review before installation.
Concern level assessed by the review: Critical. This is the review's scale, not the registry badge.
Reviewed by gemini-2.5-flash. The model sees the findings, not your code, and cannot change a score.