Loading the registry…
鲁班（Luban）——Skill打磨工坊。把一个"能用的Skill"打磨成"能被理解、能被安装、能被传播、能被验证、能持续进化"的公共Skill资产。 方法论是工匠式的五个动作：验料（先挑战这个Skill的前提是否成立，不值得雕的料直说）、访行（联网寻找同类Skill，看清自己在生态里站什么位置）、过尺（结构、实测、活体三把尺一起量——活体指拉真实运行产物对账，绿色的CI会撒谎）、慢刨（冻结原版做基线，改动必须通过验证门才保留，否则回刀；验证手段尽量沉淀为仓库里的工具和规矩）、回炉（发布不是终点，留对标观察清单，下一轮从真实反馈进）。 当用户想要升级、优化、打磨、产品化、发布自己开发的Skill时使用。最终产出一份结构化的《Skill打磨报告》、可直接替换的改写片段，以及一张可截图传播的"出师证书"结果卡。 触发词包括但不限于：让鲁班看看这个skill、班门打磨、打磨我的skill、升级我的skill、优化这个skill、skill体检、skill审计、产品化我的skill、这个skill怎么发布、对标一下同类skill、为什么我的skill没人装、帮我把skill发到GitHub/ClawHub、改进SKILL.md。 即使用户只是丢来一个Skill目录、GitHub仓库链接或一段SKILL.md说"帮我看看怎么改"，只要上下文是想让Skill变得更好用、更可传播，都应该触发。 不要用于从零创建一个新Skill（用skill-creator）、不要用于普通的代码review（用code-review）、不要用于改写一段和Skill资产无关的普通提示语。
Claude Skills are markdown + scripts loaded into Claude Code; scanned with the same pipeline.
We found this by crawling public sources and nobody has attested to it. That is how most of the registry gets here, and it is not a mark against the artifact — it only means no authenticated act of publication is on record. An artifact can be the vendor's own and still appear here.
Claude Skills install to a single target, no runtime picker.
nerlo install -- luban
Manual alternative: copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ so Claude Code loads it on next launch.
cp -r -- luban ~/.claude/skills/
Install respects the composite badge: Clean proceeds, Caution prompts for confirmation, and Flagged is refused. Write operations require an API token.
3 of 11 scanners examined this package. The rest do not apply to it — language, ecosystem and packaging decide which analyzers can say anything, and a scanner that cannot examine an artifact reports nothing rather than passing it.
v2.0.11
7 findings · 13.1s
v0.3.26
1 finding · 1.0s
v0.1.0
0 findings · 5.0s
v1.4.0
None of the entry points this scanner reads were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.4s
v0.1.0
No source files this scanner can analyze were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 5.0s
vv0.3.2
No Go packages were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.71.0
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.3s
v2.3.8
No dependency manifest or lockfile was found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.2s
v0.71.0
No container image was published for this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.0s
vv1.6.0
No Go modules were found in this artifact. What each scanner covers
0 findings · 0.1s
No report in this scan: nerlo-multi-source.
1 scan on record. Every scan's full results are retained immutably for 24 months.
| Completed | Composite | Change | Scanners | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2026 | Caution93 | — | agentshield ·n/a: not applicablecisco-skill-scanner: completeagent-audit-kit: completenerlo-behavioral ·n/a: not applicablenerlo-install-instruction: completecapslock ·n/a: not applicabletrivy ·n/a: not applicableosv-scanner ·n/a: not applicabletrivy_image ·n/a: not applicablegovulncheck ·n/a: not applicable | completed |
Findings in files this artifact installs stand as reported; a model re-read the rest and said which ones it believes are false positives. This is a second opinion published beside the evidence, not a correction to it: the per-scanner reports above are unchanged, every dismissed finding is still listed there at its original severity, and the score and the Caution badge are computed from those raw severities alone. Nothing below moved them.
This review has not run for this scan yet. It runs once per scan, in the background, and is kept; it appears here when it has. Until then all 8 findings above stand exactly as their scanners reported them, at full severity.